Posted by manualblock [ 69.112.43.172 ] on November 11, 2005 at 15:32:56:
In Reply to: Re: Just for you Manual. Ann Coulter on the definition of Judicial Activism. posted by Mr Vinyl on November 11, 2005 at 14:30:25:
Prissy does not mean arrogant. Thats the problem; definitions.
Exactly which liberals are saying this? I would like to read it somewhere.
I never read that about Chairman Mao???
The privacy right is explained in an earlier post on this site. I don't want to re-write so I must ask you look for it. It is in an exchange between myself and Akhilesh on this forum.
What you cite as substance is opinionated speculation.
Whoever said that judicial activism is the invalidation of laws passed by congress. If you want to call it that. If the law is unconstitutional then it should be invalidated. Whats so hard about that??
Liberals=straw-man. If you have nothing to say you create an antagonist and attack that phanthom to shroud your lack of intellectual rigor in a phony legitamacy.
[ Dungeon Forum ] [ Help ]