Posted by PakProtector [ 205.188.117.8 ] on December 29, 2005 at 20:32:45:

In Reply to: Intellectual Property posted by Steve Eddy on December 26, 2005 at 17:15:24:

Hey Steve,
what has gone on here with regard to intellectual property rights?

Anyway, I think the only thing protected by the (C) was the particular pice of artwork it's attached to. The CCS/Mu follower plate load is certainly nothing new. Actually, I'd suggest using a few additional complications if you were so inclined to go into production.
cheers,
Douglas

Replies:

• Re: Intellectual Property - Pak`Protector 13:32:31 12/31/05 (12)
  • Nice... - PakProtector 14:08:48 12/31/05 (11)
    • Re: Nice... - e-linear 09:24:12 01/01/06 (10)
      • Re: Nice... - PakProtector 11:29:55 01/01/06 (9)
        • Dougie, bee a lttle bit more forthcoming.... - MQracing 11:58:31 01/01/06 (8)
          • well... - PakProtector 12:44:00 01/01/06 (7)
            • found on dougie's bookshelf - MQracing 13:09:05 01/01/06 (5)
              • if... - PakProtector 13:42:33 01/01/06 (4)
                • how not to be fooled... - MQracing 14:43:58 01/01/06 (0)
                • no ifs, ands or buts about it.... - MQracing 14:04:33 01/01/06 (2)
                  • well Mike - PakProtector 17:56:11 01/03/06 (0)
                  • and I never said it didn't happen - PakProtector 15:04:47 01/01/06 (0)
            • you might want to try your antics on Bose or Monster Cable (R) - MQracing 12:56:53 01/01/06 (0)