Re: chips and tubes

Posted by Wayne Parham [ 64.216.179.54 ] on December 06, 2004 at 15:06:53:

In Reply to: chips and tubes posted by manualblock on December 06, 2004 at 11:32:49:

Maybe some see it as a minimalist approach? Maybe the fact that there is one physical device seems like fewer parts in the signal path to some?

Replies:

Re: chips and tubes - manualblock 18:10:01 12/06/04 (20)
- Re: chips and tubes - Wayne Parham 01:41:31 12/07/04 (17)
  - Re: chips and tubes - manualblock 07:36:19 12/07/04 (16)
    - Re: chips and tubes - Wayne Parham 17:01:29 12/07/04 (2)
      - Re: chips and tubes - JLM 10:45:43 01/17/05 (1)
        
        Re: chips and tubes - Wayne Parham 11:23:34 01/17/05 (0)
    - Re: chips and tubes - hitsware 11:33:45 12/07/04 (12)
      - Re: chips and tubes - manualblock 14:14:37 12/07/04 (11)
        
        Re: chips and tubes - hitsware 16:13:11 12/07/04 (10)
        
        Re: chips and tubes - manualblock 17:20:37 12/07/04 (9)
        
        Re: chips and tubes - hitsware 18:14:11 12/07/04 (8)
        
        Re: chips and tubes - manualblock 19:40:30 12/07/04 (7)
        
        Re: chips and tubes - hitsware 08:48:58 12/08/04 (6)
        
        Re: chips and tubes - manualblock 19:33:55 12/08/04 (5)
        
        Re: chips and tubes - hitsware 20:57:51 12/08/04 (4)
        
        Re: reposting schematic - hitsware 17:19:02 12/09/04 (0)
        
        Re: chips and tubes - manualblock 12:39:10 12/09/04 (2)
        
        Re: chips and tubes - hitsware 17:35:27 12/09/04 (1)
        
        Re: chips and tubes - Wayne Parham 00:04:13 12/10/04 (0)
- Re: chips and tubes - roncla 22:07:50 12/06/04 (1)
  - Re: chips and tubes - manualblock 06:50:37 12/07/04 (0)

[ Semiconductor Forum ] [ Help ]