Posted by GarMan [ 216.13.136.38 ] on April 12, 2004 at 15:57:44:

Just wondering what's available in high efficiency midrange cone drivers these days. Seems to me, small diametre cones such as 5" to 6" are pretty rare, compared to 12" or 15" cones. JBL doesn't make them anymore. Eminence only has the Alpha6. After a quick search, only Beyma and B&C makes them. Is there any reason for this trend?

I did come across the LA6's from Eminence that covers the midrange very well. Can these be used in a 3-way configuration (non-array), or is there something special about them that requires them to be in an array?

thanks,
Gar.

Replies:

• Re: Questions on Midrange Drivers - Wayne Parham 22:04:33 04/12/04 (0)
• Re: Questions on Midrange Drivers - Adrian Mack 18:56:12 04/12/04 (16)
  • Re: Questions on Midrange Drivers - GarMan 21:53:58 04/12/04 (12)
    • Re: Questions on Midrange Drivers - Adrian Mack 09:11:58 04/13/04 (11)
      • Re: Questions on Midrange Drivers - GarMan 12:46:12 04/13/04 (6)
        • Re: Questions on Midrange Drivers - Adrian Mack 19:45:17 04/13/04 (5)
          • Confused about sensitivity information - GarMan 21:33:19 04/13/04 (4)
            • Re: Confused about sensitivity information - Adrian Mack 18:30:59 04/14/04 (3)
              • Same measurement method by different results? - GarMan 08:18:19 04/15/04 (2)
                • Re: Same measurement method by different results? - Adrian Mack 09:53:59 04/15/04 (1)
                  • Re: Same measurement method by different results? - John Sheerin 07:18:06 04/21/04 (0)
      • Re: Questions on Midrange Drivers - Bill Wassilak 09:40:19 04/13/04 (3)
        • Re: Questions on Midrange Drivers - Adrian Mack 10:27:11 04/13/04 (2)
          • Re: Questions on Midrange Drivers - Bill Wassilak 10:48:21 04/13/04 (1)
            • Beware predicted HF responses. - Bill Fitzmaurice 16:11:42 04/13/04 (0)
  • Re: Questions on Midrange Drivers - Adrian Mack 18:58:21 04/12/04 (2)
    • Also consider this: - Bill Fitzmaurice 21:35:58 04/12/04 (1)
      • Re: Also consider this: - GarMan 21:57:56 04/12/04 (0)