Posted by GarMan [ 64.10.99.160 ] on April 12, 2004 at 21:53:58:

In Reply to: Re: Questions on Midrange Drivers posted by Adrian Mack on April 12, 2004 at 18:56:12:

Adrian,

I'm glad you answered my post. I wanted to ask you about your choice of Alpha 6 for your midrange horn project. The response curve for the driver looks great. What were your reasons for choosing this cone? In your application, are you finding any limitations with this "entry-level" driver in Eminence's line, compared to their more "advanced" models?

About your first statement, that "pro/PA demands larger drivers with more power handling and output", the "more power handling and output" makes sense. But I don't see how the "larger drivers" part fits in. Can't smaller drivers be made with large power handling and output too?

Gar.

Replies:

• Re: Questions on Midrange Drivers - Adrian Mack 09:11:58 04/13/04 (11)
  • Re: Questions on Midrange Drivers - GarMan 12:46:12 04/13/04 (6)
    • Re: Questions on Midrange Drivers - Adrian Mack 19:45:17 04/13/04 (5)
      • Confused about sensitivity information - GarMan 21:33:19 04/13/04 (4)
        • Re: Confused about sensitivity information - Adrian Mack 18:30:59 04/14/04 (3)
          • Same measurement method by different results? - GarMan 08:18:19 04/15/04 (2)
            • Re: Same measurement method by different results? - Adrian Mack 09:53:59 04/15/04 (1)
              • Re: Same measurement method by different results? - John Sheerin 07:18:06 04/21/04 (0)
  • Re: Questions on Midrange Drivers - Bill Wassilak 09:40:19 04/13/04 (3)
    • Re: Questions on Midrange Drivers - Adrian Mack 10:27:11 04/13/04 (2)
      • Re: Questions on Midrange Drivers - Bill Wassilak 10:48:21 04/13/04 (1)
        • Beware predicted HF responses. - Bill Fitzmaurice 16:11:42 04/13/04 (0)