Posted by Earl Geddes [ 69.209.132.100 ] on December 21, 2005 at 13:47:56:

In Reply to: Aspect ratio posted by Wayne Parham on December 21, 2005 at 10:21:35:

"But I can't think of a single instance where a symmetric coverage pattern is desired."

Find me a woofer with an asymetrical polar pattern and I'll agree with you. To me MATCHING directivity, DI, power response through the crossover is more important having a narrower vertical directivity.

Replies:

• Re: I can think of one - Wayne Parham 16:34:26 12/21/05 (13)
  • A fiction - Earl Geddes 18:03:17 12/21/05 (12)
    • Re: A fact - Wayne Parham 21:55:41 12/21/05 (11)
      • Re: A fact - Earl Geddes 07:38:53 12/22/05 (10)
        • Re: A fact - Wayne Parham 09:38:57 12/22/05 (9)
          • Re: A fact - majestik6 19:35:14 12/29/05 (1)
            • Re: A fact - Wayne Parham 20:35:41 12/29/05 (0)
          • I've heard this before - Earl Geddes 11:08:51 12/22/05 (6)
            • Angular coverage defined - Wayne Parham 11:53:00 12/22/05 (5)
              • Your twisting arround the def - Earl Geddes 13:36:27 12/22/05 (4)
                • Eighth-space = 9dB DI - Wayne Parham 14:36:07 12/22/05 (3)
                  • Re: Eighth-space = 9dB DI - Earl Geddes 15:05:51 12/22/05 (2)
                    • Re: Eighth-space = 9dB DI - Wayne Parham 17:29:26 12/22/05 (1)
                      • Re: Eighth-space = 9dB DI - Earl Geddes 20:11:06 12/22/05 (0)