Posted by Earl Geddes [ 69.209.132.100 ] on December 22, 2005 at 11:08:51:

In Reply to: Re: A fact posted by Wayne Parham on December 22, 2005 at 09:38:57:

Wayne

You've made this argument before and I still don't buy it. DI of a system in a room is not defined as DI is only applicable to free space. So using DI the way that you are is not reasonable. If we are talking about how speakers perform in real rooms thats fine, but then lets drop any DI discussions. If we are talking about DI then we have to assume that we are talking about a free field.

You room boundary extension concepts are grossly over-simplified and I continue to doubt that things work the way you hope they do.

Your dual axi-symmetric approach does work fine - agreed - if you can live with a cabinet that is now twice as wide. I made this point earlier too. You keep repeating your points as if you don't even read my rebuttal.

Replies:

• Angular coverage defined - Wayne Parham 11:53:00 12/22/05 (5)
  • Your twisting arround the def - Earl Geddes 13:36:27 12/22/05 (4)
    • Eighth-space = 9dB DI - Wayne Parham 14:36:07 12/22/05 (3)
      • Re: Eighth-space = 9dB DI - Earl Geddes 15:05:51 12/22/05 (2)
        • Re: Eighth-space = 9dB DI - Wayne Parham 17:29:26 12/22/05 (1)
          • Re: Eighth-space = 9dB DI - Earl Geddes 20:11:06 12/22/05 (0)