Posted by Damir [ 213.202.111.254 ] on December 22, 2005 at 13:19:22:

In Reply to: misuse of trademarks posted by MQracing on December 22, 2005 at 12:30:19:

Yes, all those problems arose from the fact that I rejected to ban Douglas for using "modifed, E-linear version of old Peerles S265Q design, made by Heybour". I`m not a judge, lawyer, nor a psychiatrist - I can`t solve your personal (and maybe legal) problems with Douglas.
All I can, I`ve already done - I warned you both several times through the forum and privately to not abuse GB forum for arguing, then deleting takes place.

Replies:

• Re: misuse of trademarks - MQracing 13:47:13 12/22/05 (2)
  • Re: misuse of trademarks - Damir 14:02:57 12/22/05 (1)
    • Re: misuse of trademarks - MQracing 14:16:18 12/22/05 (0)
• Damir's latest moderation miscues... - MQracing 13:36:22 12/22/05 (6)
  • Re: Damir's latest moderation miscues... - Damir 13:55:01 12/22/05 (5)
    • Re: Damir's latest moderation miscues... - MQracing 14:04:46 12/22/05 (4)
      • you couldn't stay on topic if your life depended on it. - PakProtector 21:35:41 12/22/05 (2)
        • The Rolecks President.... no it's not a new watch... it's dougies new transormer - MQracing 22:05:06 12/22/05 (1)
          • this is even funnier than the last!!! - PakProtector 22:03:39 12/23/05 (0)
      • Re: Damir's latest moderation miscues... - Damir 14:12:58 12/22/05 (0)
• Re: misuse of trademarks - MQracing 13:28:58 12/22/05 (7)
  • How simple that is... - Damir 13:58:27 12/22/05 (6)
    • Re: How simple that is... - MQracing 14:10:16 12/22/05 (5)
      • it is really fairly simple - PakProtector 21:30:39 12/22/05 (2)
        • Re: it is really fairly simple - MQracing 22:01:00 12/22/05 (1)
          • Re: it is really fairly simple - PakProtector 05:20:27 12/23/05 (0)
      • Re: How simple that is... - Damir 14:15:24 12/22/05 (1)
        • Re: How simple that is... - MQracing 14:19:27 12/22/05 (0)