AudioRoundTable.com: Pi Speakers » Reconing JBL 2245 to 2241

Home » Sponsored » Pi Speakers » Reconing JBL 2245 to 2241

Show: Today's Messages :: Navigator :: Polls
E-mail to friend

Reconing JBL 2245 to 2241 [message #46340]

Thu, 17 February 2005 07:28

spkrman57
Messages: 522
Registered: May 2009

Illuminati (1st Degree)

I am in the process of getting a pair of cabinets (ported) with a interior volume of 8.8 cu ft, tuned with 2 ports to 28hz per current owner.

These cabs were used with JBL 2245's by the previous owner, I can procure a pair of blown 2245's and recone kit for 2240/2241, I have a speaker tech who will perform the recone and wondering what animal will result by this surgical procedure.

I am more interested in the recone being closer to the 2240/2241 than the 2245(which has its share of probs I don't want to deal with)

I welcome any and all info regarding this scenario, you will not hurt my feelings, I need to know if there is any detrimental effect with this recone. The tech has all the parts already, just waiting for my go-ahead on this venture.

If this works okay, I will use my Altec 288 on 350hz round tractix Edgarhorn and finish off with a pair of JBL 075's for a sweet 3 way system.

Ron

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Reconing JBL 2245 to 2241 By: spkrman57 on Thu, 17 February 2005 07:28
		Sorry - recone to 2240 By: spkrman57 on Thu, 17 February 2005 08:43
		Re: Sorry - recone to 2240 By: dwkurfma on Thu, 17 February 2005 14:32
		Taco Bell By: Wayne Parham on Thu, 17 February 2005 16:47
		Re: Taco Bell By: Russellc on Thu, 17 February 2005 19:29
		Re: Taco Bell By: Wayne Parham on Thu, 17 February 2005 21:34
		Re: Taco Bell By: Russellc on Fri, 18 February 2005 04:52
		Re: Taco Bell By: :mikeo: on Fri, 18 February 2005 05:32
		Re: Taco Bell By: dwkurfma on Sun, 20 February 2005 18:37
		Re: Taco Bell By: Wayne Parham on Mon, 21 February 2005 07:07
		I'd stay with the 2245 By: Wayne Parham on Thu, 17 February 2005 16:19
		2245 cone is too heavy for the suspension... By: spkrman57 on Fri, 18 February 2005 09:08
		The 2245 is tuned lower By: Wayne Parham on Fri, 18 February 2005 16:54
		2245 xmax=.38 2240 xmax=.22 By: :mikeo: on Fri, 18 February 2005 18:09
		2240's are not for sub duty By: spkrman57 on Sat, 19 February 2005 07:33
		As an aside, By: Wayne Parham on Sun, 20 February 2005 04:27
		Re: As an aside, By: Chris R on Sun, 20 February 2005 07:23
		Re: As an aside, By: Wayne Parham on Sun, 20 February 2005 07:42
		Re: As an aside, By: Chris R on Mon, 21 February 2005 02:25
		Re: As an aside, By: Wayne Parham on Mon, 21 February 2005 07:15
		Re: As an aside, By: DRC on Mon, 11 April 2005 10:59
		Re: As an aside, By: Wayne Parham on Mon, 11 April 2005 11:47
		Altec 288 on 350hz Edgarhorn from 500hz on up to JBL 075's By: spkrman57 on Sun, 20 February 2005 10:47
		Re: Altec 288 on 350hz Edgarhorn from 500hz on up to JBL 075's By: Wayne Parham on Sun, 20 February 2005 10:50
		Re: Sorry - recone to 2240 By: Bill Martinelli on Thu, 17 February 2005 17:38

Previous Topic:	Can I just sandbag it?
Next Topic:	It must be the Auricaps

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Wed May 15 11:07:12 CDT 2024