Home » Sponsored » Pi Speakers » Here we go again. Merits of 2" compression vs cone midrange
Here we go again. Merits of 2" compression vs cone midrange [message #44686] Mon, 31 May 2004 15:09 Go to previous message
GarMan is currently offline  GarMan
Messages: 960
Registered: May 2009
Illuminati (2nd Degree)
Sorry to bring the same subject up again, but I'm looking for a bit for information for a question I brought up a few months ago. I'm looking for some more feedback on using cone vs compression for the midrange.

Is there any noticable difference in the sound produced by these two types of drivers, and if so, how would you describe the difference?

Here's a "hypothetical" situation. Let's say you start with a driver like the JBL 2235, which a lot of you have agreed is a pretty decent cone. Would you cross it low, at say 200Hz to a cone midrange, or would you cross it a little higher at 800Hz, with a 2" compression like the JBL 2445?

I'm found a lot of arguments on this board for the cone midrange, but there must be some merit to the 2" compression.

thanks,
Gar.

 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: studio 2 pi
Next Topic: Two Pi Plans
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Thu May 23 06:52:40 CDT 2024

Sponsoring Organizations

DIY Audio Projects
DIY Audio Projects
OddWatt Audio
OddWatt Audio
Pi Speakers
Pi Speakers
Prosound Shootout
Prosound Shootout
Smith & Larson Audio
Smith & Larson Audio
Tubes For Amps
TubesForAmps.com

Lone Star Audiofest