Home » Sponsored » Pi Speakers » Back from the Vet and de-Wormed
Zobels on Tweeters [message #42327 is a reply to message #42323] Mon, 01 September 2003 14:13 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Wayne Parham is currently offline  Wayne Parham
Messages: 18688
Registered: January 2001
Illuminati (33rd Degree)

If the horn proves to still be too hot, you might use a Zobel or maybe just shunt resistance. When padding a voice-coil driven loudspeaker, using a Zobel for the shunt leg of the circuit will ensure that the output from the crossover remains flat. It will also provide damping so that there is no peak in the crossover region, just like what the values of R1 and R2 do in the π circuit.

Just rearrange the circuit a bit, having series attenuation resistance before a Zobel placed in shunt across the tweeter. You can play with the Zobel values of R and C to generate the top-octave response curve that you want, and can play with the ratio of Zobel resistance to attenuation resistance to set the amount of damping, which will modify the response near the crossover frequency.

I designed the π crossover specifically to provide rising response. The intended use was with compression horns that had a characteristic negative slope in their response curves, and the π crossover configuration addresses that. Since the tweeter isn't flat, the circuit compensates so that the system is flat. It provides attenuation for level matching, top-octave compensation for the tweeter's inherent rolloff and damping of the voice-coil/crossover interaction so that it doesn't peak near the crossover frequency. But if your tweeter is already hot in the top octave, then this is not what you want.

If you want the crossover to give flat response - or less of a rising response - then a different attenuation and damping mechanism may be in order. Any time there is series resistance, this will introduce some positive slope because the voice-coil is partually inductive. Since the load is inductive, a series resistance will generate rising response. Putting shunt resistance across the tweeter will tend to reduce the slope and make the circuit have less rising response, and adding some shunt capacitance can bring slope to zero, making the circuit flat. That's what a Zobel does. Or the design can go the other way, having series bypass capacitance across the attenuation resistor to increase rising response, like the π circuit does, to compensate for top-octave rolloff of compression horn devices. So using less than a half dozen components in various configurations, you can provide a wide variety of response curves.

The point I'm making is that if you've padded a compression tweeter, then you've added some amount of rising response. You can increase it with configurations like the π crossover using bypass capacitance across the series attenuation resistor. But if you don't want rising response, then the shunt leg should have series capacitance to act as a Zobel. Adding pure resistance in shunt will reduce rising response to some degree, and it will serve to damp the circuit too. But adding a Zobel damper will bring the top octave down to match midband response, and you can completely eliminate any rising response with it too.

 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: measurement questions
Next Topic: Madisound have a really great service!!!!!
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sun May 12 21:37:58 CDT 2024

Sponsoring Organizations

DIY Audio Projects
DIY Audio Projects
OddWatt Audio
OddWatt Audio
Pi Speakers
Pi Speakers
Prosound Shootout
Prosound Shootout
Smith & Larson Audio
Smith & Larson Audio
Tubes For Amps
TubesForAmps.com

Lone Star Audiofest