Home » Audio » Speaker » Hi-Efficiency vs Lo-Efficiency Speakers
Re: Hi-Efficiency vs Lo-Efficiency Speakers [message #17346 is a reply to message #17344] Thu, 13 January 2005 07:25 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Earl Geddes is currently offline  Earl Geddes
Messages: 220
Registered: May 2009
Master
Wayne

Thanks

Yes this is old stuff. John's paper is also misleading or wrong as proved by JBL's own recent product moves.

Its not just the gap geometry that lowers the distortion in an ALNICO structure. ALNICO is a good electrical conductor, unlike ceramic, an so it is its own a shorting ring! So his conclusion that the geometry accounts for the changes is incorrect. JBL recently started to use ALNICO again for variuos reasons - lower flux modulation and near zero flux changes with themerature, both of which are very bad in ceramic.

Then there is the fact that second and third harmonics are not really the important ones.

John's paper was the prevailing philosophy at the time, but now we know more than we did then.

Its hard to beat ALNICO for performance, but its price and weight are real drawbacks. The better drivers today are using laminar motor structures with each lamina being copper plated.




 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: fostex rear loaded horn design
Next Topic: Coral Beta 6 in Ebay
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sat May 18 05:47:04 CDT 2024

Sponsoring Organizations

DIY Audio Projects
DIY Audio Projects
OddWatt Audio
OddWatt Audio
Pi Speakers
Pi Speakers
Prosound Shootout
Prosound Shootout
Smith & Larson Audio
Smith & Larson Audio
Tubes For Amps
TubesForAmps.com

Lone Star Audiofest