If not; what part of a link should one take to represent the point of view of the one who provides the link?
Should we accept all of the link as proof of their point of veiw; or just some of the link?
Then how do we know which part of the provided link to accept as the point of view of the person who provides that link?
When you post a link to prove your case; do we need to take the entire link as offered? Or just some part of whats offered? And how do we distinguish what to use and what to disregard concerning links provided by people to prove a position they hold?
If part of the link says something; is that to be taken as the link providers position?

I just need to know the protocol for determining what part of links represent your point of view and what part of them I should disregard.

Thank You.