| ? ART Array VS Zaph's BAMTM [message #24217] |
Sun, 16 March 2008 13:29  |
Dan
Messages: 16
Registered: May 2009
|
Chancellor |
|
|
Hi,
I've posted here before asking about arrays.
I've got a couple more questions : )
How well do you think a design like Zaph's BAMTM would translate to ART Array configuration?
I know it would only be efficient as the tweeter but ~91dB is OK with me.
The Baffle would be 9" x 95", woofers on the center line with 11" C-T-C and tweeter 1 3/8" off center per John's design.
I think the woofer line will need some attenuation to work with my ~12' listening distance.
I had originally thought going 2.5 way, but now I'm really wondering if John's simple & elegant x-over is really the way to go.
Would it be as simple as bumping up the BSC inductor to match things up? http://i111.photobucket.com/albums/n139/its-loud-dude/DA175/DA175Xovr.jpg
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: ? ART Array VS Zaph's BAMTM [message #24222 is a reply to message #24219] |
Thu, 20 March 2008 23:23  |
Dave
Messages: 27
Registered: May 2009
|
Chancellor |
|
|
|
I would put the tweeter at ear level for your primary listening position. I tried to compromise with a 104 dB horn tweeter between sitting and standing, the tweeter can keep up with the mids only at ear level for less than 15 feet. So the other day I went out and got 8 feet of tweeter, the world is going to be a much better place.
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
Members
Search
Help
Register
Login
Get a T-Shirt!
