Home » Audio » Speaker » Questions on Midrange Drivers
Re: Questions on Midrange Drivers [message #16377 is a reply to message #16376] Tue, 13 April 2004 09:48 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Bill Wassilak is currently offline  Bill Wassilak
Messages: 402
Registered: May 2009
Illuminati (1st Degree)
Some of the computer simulations I have ran had a hard time predicting hi freq response of cone drivers. I didn't measure the off axis polar response of my horns, but I was shooting for 90deg at the upper cutoff frequency (1.2Khz) to match the dispersion of my JBL2345 midhorns on top. The flare taper of my horns are a hyper-expo taper flare at 150hz, response was measured with a Peavey Scorpion Plus model 12825, a 12" guitar speaker that Peavey makes. The lowest I can run them is about 180hz otherwise I start getting that horn shout if I run them any lower. But other than that they are very smooth upto the 1.2k x-over point even off axis they pretty well match the JBL horns off axis.

Bill W.

Re: Questions on Midrange Drivers [message #16378 is a reply to message #16374] Tue, 13 April 2004 11:46 Go to previous messageGo to next message
GarMan is currently offline  GarMan
Messages: 960
Registered: May 2009
Illuminati (2nd Degree)
Thanks for the detailed explaination, Adrian.

At this time, I'm at the "research" stage for a 3-way and yes, I am considering using the Alpha 6 as a direct radiator. I'm looking for a midrange that'll take me from 100Hz up to 3KHz to 4KHz. The reponse graph of the Alpha looks great and I was wondering how it would sound. According to the graph, it's putting out close to 100dB with 1 watt, so I never even considered horn loading it.

In terms of "sound", I interested to know how smooth it is pass the 1.5 KHz mark, whether it breaks up into a cardboardy sound. I noticed that the Alpha 10 in my 2 PI Towers sound a lot better after I crossed it at 1.6KHz with a PSD2002, rather than let it run into 4KHz.

About power handling, I've noticed that within a product line, the smaller drivers tend to have 3 - 6 more dB's in sensitivity than the larger driver. Same SPL at 50% or 25% of the power required for the larger drivers, meaning power handling becomes less of an issue.

Like I said, just research for now, so there'll be more questions to come.

Gar.

Beware predicted HF responses. [message #16379 is a reply to message #16377] Tue, 13 April 2004 15:11 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Bill Fitzmaurice is currently offline  Bill Fitzmaurice
Messages: 335
Registered: May 2009
Grand Master
I use McBean, and while it is reasonably accurate in predicting Fc and about an octave or two higher, it is way off the mark past that. How high can a twelve go? My DR12 loaded with an EVM 12L gets 114dB at 4kHz, and it's a folded horn to boot. The question shouldn't be how high can you go, but how high before dispersion gets too beamy for a particular application. For example, look at the axial plot in this chart for my DR 250a, and note how things start getting a bit hinky around 2kHz, which is where it gets crossed over to the HF section not because of SPL (the SN10 woofer is fine to 4kHz) but because of dispersion.

Re: Questions on Midrange Drivers [message #16382 is a reply to message #16378] Tue, 13 April 2004 18:45 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Adrian Mack is currently offline  Adrian Mack
Messages: 568
Registered: May 2009
Illuminati (1st Degree)
Hi Garman

The little Alpha 6 is more like 93db 1w/1m actually in its pistonic range.



These are the 1w/1m figures taken directly from the Eminence Sensitivity Guide page. Using the referance efficiency n0 equation and converting to SPL @ 1w/1m also agrees with an average 93db 1w/1m. Many larger 12" to 18" drivers can do ~98db 1w/1m, some more, some less, and they have higher power handling too. Note this is just generalization, what can potentially happen but also what usually does. I think intended use is more of the issue, small midrange drivers arn't needed for MI apps like Bill said, those guys usually want a big driver that can go lower for thier bass guitars and then cross to a compression driver at the top end. Even in pro/PA horns, most tend to use larger drivers instead because they can get even more output this way and/or they want to cover a lower frequency range. Or they just incorrectly run a 2" driver crossed too low until you here the diaphragms about to snap, hence not needing a small 5/6" midrange driver :P either way!

In my horn, and on-axis the Alpha 6 is +/- 2.5db from 300Hz to 2KHz. Off axis response is pretty smooth throughout this range. Off axis and in the horizontal plane, response in the conical horn was best to 1.8KHz or so to just within its coverage angle, a nominal 60 deg between each extreme or 30 left and 30 right. It was the same thing for the vertical plane, 40 degrees between each extreme, though obviously at a little lower levels at the extremes because its asymmetric, so DI is different. I designed it this way to minimize destructive interfernace between subsystems. I'm crossing this horn over to a 1" compression driver at 1.8KHz. Output above 2KHz falls, and you can start to get mouth resonances and stuff happening here too so I'm not going to use it here. Note this is all in my horn though, and as a direct radiator like you're using it, things will be different.

Looking at Eminences graph, breakup modes start happening around ~1.3KHz on the Alpha 6 where output rises on axis. I think the 1st breakup mode is actually lower than this, but its damped enough not to show itself. Breakup modes on this driver arn't as severe as on others. Breakup modes on the Alpha 10 show themselves a lot more, although you do have it tamed down with the inductor, so on axis it is smooth but as a result off axis response has fallen even further. Exact figures arn't known however because Eminence dont publish actual off axis response curves for thier drivers. Breakup modes also introduce distortion, so I dont like to use drivers too far into their breakup mode regions unless I see actual distortion figures that prove its low and on and off axis response is reasonably smooth.

I'm not sure if I'd want to use an Alpha 6 at 100Hz. Its free air resonance is 118Hz, and 2nd and 3rd harmonic distortion is dramaticaly higher below resonance on any VC motor. Perhaps just cross more around 150Hz or 200Hz. Bare in mind the driver has zero VC overhang and about 1.3mm of linear xmax, although for midrange this isn't important, but below fh you need to examine it. If you cross at 200Hz, the Alpha 6 can easily get close to 115db at 1m at full power (100w) and not exceed mechanical limitations in a box which is nice and flat, I think vented between 5L and 20L tuned between 60Hz and 80Hz worked pretty well, it's been awhile since I've modelled it. I remember there were a lot of alignments that resulted in a flat response for this driver.

Adrian

Confused about sensitivity information [message #16383 is a reply to message #16382] Tue, 13 April 2004 20:33 Go to previous messageGo to next message
GarMan is currently offline  GarMan
Messages: 960
Registered: May 2009
Illuminati (2nd Degree)
Now I'm really confused about the sensitivity of the Eminence drivers. I've alway gone by the graph at the bottom of the datasheet. But comparing the graph with the data on the Sensitivity Guide, they seem completely different. What gives? Am I interpreting the graph incorrectly?

Gar.

Re: Confused about sensitivity information [message #16386 is a reply to message #16383] Wed, 14 April 2004 17:30 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Adrian Mack is currently offline  Adrian Mack
Messages: 568
Registered: May 2009
Illuminati (1st Degree)
The Eminence sensitivity guide should be showing the real 1w/1m levels of the driver. The graph must be showing something else, maybe 2.83v or something. I'd trust the sensitivity guides numbers, which are the real numbers.

n0=(9.64*10^-10*(Fs_a^3*Vas_a))/Qes_a
=(9.64*10^-10*(118^3*5.8))/0.60
=0.0153

SPL 1w/1m= 112+10*LOG(n0)
= 112+10*LOG(0.0153)
= 93.85db 1w/1m

Reference efficiency converted to 1w/1m sensitivity, it corresponds to Eminences sensitivity guide, but not the graph. The graph must be measured under different conditions.

Adrian

Same measurement method by different results? [message #16387 is a reply to message #16386] Thu, 15 April 2004 07:18 Go to previous messageGo to next message
GarMan is currently offline  GarMan
Messages: 960
Registered: May 2009
Illuminati (2nd Degree)
I always thought the response curve was correct. I've cut and paste below the measurement description found on every driver's web page:

Eminence response curves are
measured under the following
controlled test conditions:

* All speakers are tested at 1W/1m
using a variety of test set-ups for
the appropriate impedance
* LMS using 0.25" supplied
microphone (software calibrated)
mounted 1m from wall/baffle
* 2ft. X 2 ft. baffle is built into the
wall with the speaker mounted
flush against a steel ring for
minimum diffraction
* Hafler P1500 Trans-Nova
amplifier
* 2700 cu. ft. chamber with
fiberglass on all six surfaces
(three with custom-made
wedges)

This sounds consistent with the description found on the sensitivity page you provided, but yet, the numbers don't match up. What gives? Someone's going to receive a nasty letter.

Gar.


Re: Same measurement method by different results? [message #16389 is a reply to message #16387] Thu, 15 April 2004 08:53 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Adrian Mack is currently offline  Adrian Mack
Messages: 568
Registered: May 2009
Illuminati (1st Degree)
It might be that the response curve/graph is measured in half space (baffle mounted) whilst the numbers itself in the sensitivity guide are in free-air, which is what the free-air referance efficiency equation I quoted tells you. Maybe you'd want to email Eminence and ask them though just to be double sure.

Re: Same measurement method by different results? [message #16407 is a reply to message #16389] Wed, 21 April 2004 06:18 Go to previous message
John Sheerin is currently offline  John Sheerin
Messages: 8
Registered: May 2009
Esquire
Hi,
The response curve is wrong - it is shifted higher for some unknown reason. I am getting it corrected.

John

Previous Topic: Need Help understanding Fostex Line.
Next Topic: lothx, cain or king?
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Thu May 02 10:06:55 CDT 2024

Sponsoring Organizations

DIY Audio Projects
DIY Audio Projects
OddWatt Audio
OddWatt Audio
Pi Speakers
Pi Speakers
Prosound Shootout
Prosound Shootout
Smith & Larson Audio
Smith & Larson Audio
Tubes For Amps
TubesForAmps.com

Lone Star Audiofest