Home » xyzzy » Tower » million readers a month
Re: million readers a month [message #55023 is a reply to message #55022] Thu, 16 February 2006 14:37 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Manualblock is currently offline  Manualblock
Messages: 4973
Registered: May 2009
Illuminati (13th Degree)
You know it sounds as if you are not a happy camper regarding Eminence these days.

Re: million readers a month [message #55024 is a reply to message #55023] Thu, 16 February 2006 15:55 Go to previous message
Wayne Parham is currently offline  Wayne Parham
Messages: 18683
Registered: January 2001
Illuminati (33rd Degree)

I think dropping the HL10A was a mistake. If you use a pair of them in parallel, you have a nominal 4Ω load. That's a good option. The HL10C is probably OK, but they had to fudge stuff to get the motor strength, and that required a smaller cooling vent. I'm not sure that was a good idea. Maybe it will work just fine in some applications, but I still prefer the HL10A with its larger cooling vent. And there are people out there with an investment in sound equipment using HL10A's already that won't be able to maintain their speakers because the part is no longer available.

I had planned to make a scaled version of the 12π basshorn sub, a smaller, lighter horn with a pair of HL10A drivers in push-pull. They would use the same heat exchanger as the 12π too. This proposed 10π basshorn was to be something that would have been good for smaller venues. Where the 12π was a Top-Fuel Dragster, this 10π would have been Super Comp. Still an all-out performer, but smaller and lighter, for smaller venues that didn't need the oomph of the 12π.

But I'm not going to go through that design effort for the HL10C. It is waaaay too much work to spend the time developing a good loudspeaker only for the vendor to drop support of parts contained inside it, so I am very glad I hadn't undertaken the 10π project yet. This kind of thing has happened before, and it is a major inconvenience when you have put as much effort in a loudspeaker design as I do. These things aren't one-offs, and they aren't a trivial design effort.

I'm also disappointed Eminence decided to drop the Magnums. They're never going to sell as many of the most expensive premium parts they have as they do of the inexpensive bang-for-the-buck parts. But it's nice to have the good parts available.

I always liked their mid level stuff, but I'm disappointed that they've dropped the Magnums. They've modified them in a way that makes them unworkable for me. I don't intend to design something for the new drivers they're building now, so that means I won't be offering a premium line using Eminence any longer. They're still great for the bang-for-the-buck lines, but I was hoping to see them maintain their high end stuff too.


Previous Topic: Addicted to Foreign Oil? Recant That Statement
Next Topic: Cheney-Inspired Trivia
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sun May 05 10:28:19 CDT 2024

Sponsoring Organizations

DIY Audio Projects
DIY Audio Projects
OddWatt Audio
OddWatt Audio
Pi Speakers
Pi Speakers
Prosound Shootout
Prosound Shootout
Smith & Larson Audio
Smith & Larson Audio
Tubes For Amps
TubesForAmps.com

Lone Star Audiofest