Home » Audio » Thermionic Emissions » possible group build
Re: possible group build [message #10881 is a reply to message #10878] Thu, 16 December 2004 06:14 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Manualblock is currently offline  Manualblock
Messages: 4973
Registered: May 2009
Illuminati (13th Degree)
I use the hexfreds in my AES pre and they sound nice. I kinda thought you would have some suggestions on alternative power options and in the spirit of the build it is nice to be exposed to many differing options. If I didn't have a spare 6x4 tube I would considore a SS power supply if only due to reduced cost of transformer.

I second tube rectifier [message #10883 is a reply to message #10878] Thu, 16 December 2004 12:14 Go to previous messageGo to next message
colinhester is currently offline  colinhester
Messages: 1349
Registered: May 2009
Location: NE Arkansas
Illuminati (3rd Degree)
The reference site we're using uses the tube rectifier. I would like to use their information as a basis as much as possible. Have you seen the power point presentation on the site? It's so over the top. This is the model that we should use for future builds. It gives step-by-step layouts of power and signal runs. Also the close up shots of wiring rival those found in Bottlehead's new SEX manual, which I thought was the cat's meow.

JR, Please don't get me wrong, I'm all for experimenting, and I think it would VERY educational to explore the differences in power supply construction and performance. This is what this hobby is about!

Wayne, is it possible to set up a group build forum, not only for this project but future ones as well?

We need to finalize what we're going to build and how we're going to relate information. One thought: it might be fun for each to build slightly different variations and send them to one of the club meetings (Tulsa?) for direct comparison. This would allow each variation to be evaluated head-to-head under "identical" conditions.

I know I keep saying this, but I cannot tell you guys how excited I am about this. Hands on anything is quickly becoming a lost art. I think it's important to keep this hobby (and skill set) alive......Regards, Colin

how simple do you want to get? [message #10905 is a reply to message #10873] Mon, 20 December 2004 09:38 Go to previous messageGo to next message
PakProtector is currently offline  PakProtector
Messages: 935
Registered: May 2009
Illuminati (2nd Degree)

There are a few interesting things to try.

First the minimum reactance PS. It will require a CCS to execute. Let's try two CCS as active plate loads and do a simple 6CA4>>L>>100uF Oiler/motor run.

One or two red LED in series will do a fine job of cathode bias. we are running absolutely constant-current through the valve.

Simpler PS, and Cascoded DN2540N5 current regulators have a low output mu-follower output. These two benefits ought to be enough to justify building a second CCS. 400V D-S. Full wave from a 150-0-150 plate winding will keep things safe 'til the cathodes heat up, and the PS turns properly regulated L-C.

Choke from Hammond, 30 Hy/40 mA. PS cap, eBay's midorimeadows has ASC 370 VAC/100 uF for $10.

On to coupling caps. 5-10 uF motor run oilers are good here. No sense making output z too high at low frequency.

Here is the extreme example of where this design can be taken if you need some time to relax, and building is the chosen method. This one is L-C to a pair of CCS, feeding a pair of VR150's for each channel, which is actively loaded 2C50.

It sounds better than it looks, it only took a weekend to build.
regards,
Douglas

....damn Thrintun!

Re: how simple do you want to get? [message #10906 is a reply to message #10905] Mon, 20 December 2004 11:04 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Wayne Parham is currently offline  Wayne Parham
Messages: 18675
Registered: January 2001
Illuminati (33rd Degree)
Hi Douglas,

I was thinking probably a very simple circuit with a rectifier and LC filter to start with. About the regulated supplies, have you ever doen one that was all-tube? I'm not opposed to solid state at all, but it is kind of cool to be all tube. Makes for a lot of real estate though, I imagine.

Wayne

to blazes with simple [message #10907 is a reply to message #10906] Mon, 20 December 2004 12:35 Go to previous messageGo to next message
PakProtector is currently offline  PakProtector
Messages: 935
Registered: May 2009
Illuminati (2nd Degree)
Hey-Hey!!!,
On the all valve: The PS should remain shunt regulated,and it will probably be fairly easy. A single pentode configured as a curent regulator to feed the VR tubes is about as simple as the MOSFET version.

The Amplifier active loads are not so easy with a pentode. The g2 circuit in parallel with the plate is the issue( as I see it now ). Sooooo, how about a cascoded pair of triodes? Series curent path and high AC impedance, and still able to retain the mu-follower's signal output. It would probably be best to use a cascoded MOSFET CCS to generate the Ec2, but that would be th extent of it, and that is two DN3545N3 and three resistors...

I have heard another all valve, regulated linestage and it was really good. this should be able to match or better its performance with a simple signal path like my hybrid.

I have another in the planning stage to use the 10Y as the amplifier valve, and this PS and load idea is how it will get done. It will have a few more valves sticking up through the top, but that's OK with me.

You heard it here first!

Of course I'd keep the 816-rectified, L-C unregulated supply...
regards,
Douglas
!

Re: to blazes with simple [message #10909 is a reply to message #10907] Tue, 21 December 2004 04:15 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Wayne Parham is currently offline  Wayne Parham
Messages: 18675
Registered: January 2001
Illuminati (33rd Degree)
Interesting. I like the idea of an all-tube circuit with regulated supply. That's pretty cool. I also like the idea of the simple old-school LC filtered version. So I could see an entry level build with simple rectified and filtered supply, and a deluxe model with regulated supply.

PSUD sayeth... [message #10910 is a reply to message #10909] Tue, 21 December 2004 04:43 Go to previous messageGo to next message
PakProtector is currently offline  PakProtector
Messages: 935
Registered: May 2009
Illuminati (2nd Degree)
Hey-Hey!!!,
A 15 mA/channel with 20 Hy and 100 uF gives less than a volt of ripple with a 1kV CT plate supply. Combine that with a tube active load and I suspect that a regulated supply is not required.

The vlave shunt regulator has cool out the bazooo from a string of 3 0D3's. This will want a HV/unregulated supply of ~600V and that IMO, is pushing it, let alone for entry level.

The 1kV CT can be done quite easily with damper diodes like the 12AX4 or 6AU4 depending on your available filament supply. A delay is needed for an LC like this and dampers are just the ticket. Doesn't glow like an 816 though...
regards,
Douglas

....damn Thrintun!

Sweet! [message #10911 is a reply to message #10910] Tue, 21 December 2004 05:09 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Wayne Parham is currently offline  Wayne Parham
Messages: 18675
Registered: January 2001
Illuminati (33rd Degree)
I like!

I have a schematic in hand... [message #10912 is a reply to message #10911] Tue, 21 December 2004 05:41 Go to previous messageGo to next message
PakProtector is currently offline  PakProtector
Messages: 935
Registered: May 2009
Illuminati (2nd Degree)
Hey-hey!!!,
There are some isues, like a bunch of cathodes riding at voltages significantly distant fromeach other voltage-wise... Looks like two filament supplies.

It is for this app: 12B4A amplifier valve, 15 mA current, biased with my favourite red LED's. 6BK7/6DJ8 half at the bottom of the cascode, sharing its filament supply with the 12B4. Half a 5687 on the top ov the cascode, with its own filament supply. The 5687 cathode is ~250V and that's the reason.

Four valves, not including the rectifiers, and requiring a B+ of ~450.

I feel sad, it is about Christmas, and if I take time out to build this now, I'll get shot. Probably after getting my doo-dads squished in a big vise.

As far as parts go, the Hammond 193C 20 Hy choke ought to do for the power inductor. a 500-0-500 is 'up to you', I have at least two of them. L-C-R-C DC filament supplies are not too much trouble.

If this works as well as I think it will, I'll have to lay out the Green for a nice pair of 10's...
regards,
Douglas

....damn Thrintun!

Re: I have a schematic in hand... [message #10916 is a reply to message #10912] Tue, 21 December 2004 06:18 Go to previous message
Wayne Parham is currently offline  Wayne Parham
Messages: 18675
Registered: January 2001
Illuminati (33rd Degree)
Yep, yep. Better to enjoy the holidays and reserve the rest of the project work until afterwards.

Previous Topic: 2A3 Upgrade (Paramour)
Next Topic: A pentode on the input circuit...
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Thu Apr 18 16:31:17 CDT 2024

Sponsoring Organizations

DIY Audio Projects
DIY Audio Projects
OddWatt Audio
OddWatt Audio
Pi Speakers
Pi Speakers
Prosound Shootout
Prosound Shootout
Smith & Larson Audio
Smith & Larson Audio
Tubes For Amps
TubesForAmps.com

Lone Star Audiofest