|
|
|
|
My HT setup [message #15843 is a reply to message #15833] |
Mon, 15 December 2003 11:45 |
HenryW
Messages: 44 Registered: May 2009
|
Baron |
|
|
Well - I thought I might give you a few shots of my Heresy based HT setup. The last picture is an example of a unique location for Heresy. Just paste the following in your Browser address bar: http://www.home.earthlink.net/~hwatkins/id63.htm As an added bonus, here is my finished 2 Pi speakers: http://www.home.earthlink.net/~hwatkins/id62.htm
|
|
|
|
Re: Heresy modifications [message #15848 is a reply to message #15842] |
Mon, 15 December 2003 21:01 |
hurdy_gurdyman
Messages: 416 Registered: May 2009
|
Illuminati (1st Degree) |
|
|
Wayne, Were you asking what I had done, or if Jim had done them?On mine, I put 16 Ohm resistors on the squawker, changed autoformer to lower efficiency a bit in the mids, added dowel to box to stiffen, put plumbers putty on outside of the horn and woofer basket, added stuffing to inside of box and built the P-trap for the squawker. I think that covers everything I've done to the old 1975 Heresy's. They sound MUCH better then when I found them. Dave :^)
|
|
|
Re: My HT setup [message #15849 is a reply to message #15843] |
Mon, 15 December 2003 21:07 |
hurdy_gurdyman
Messages: 416 Registered: May 2009
|
Illuminati (1st Degree) |
|
|
Nice pics, and interesting way of using Heresy's. I'm curious, how would you describe the difference in sound between the Heresy's and the 2-Pi's? I listened to a pair of 2-Pi's a year or so back and was impressed, but I never had a chance to hear them and Heresy's together, and I bought the Heresy's several months later and my sonic memory is weak.Dave
|
|
|
Re: Heresy modifications [message #15851 is a reply to message #15848] |
Mon, 15 December 2003 21:45 |
|
Wayne Parham
Messages: 18784 Registered: January 2001
|
Illuminati (33rd Degree) |
|
|
Hi Dave! I think Jim is following in your footsteps. I understand he is putting a 16 ohm resistor across the midrange and changing the transformer tap too. I'm pretty sure he learned this from you, here on the forum. He told me that he's bracing the boxes like you've described too. I expect Jim will let us know when he has had some time to install the parts and evaluate the changes. Wayne
|
|
|
One person's comparison... [message #15859 is a reply to message #15849] |
Tue, 16 December 2003 08:16 |
HenryW
Messages: 44 Registered: May 2009
|
Baron |
|
|
between the Heresy and 2 Pi. It is very much what I expected: 2 Pi - disregarding labor, materials for the 2Pi was less than $275 total. For that price I could not imagine a better new speaker. It is very efficient and a surprising two way. The Eminence speaker was an instant success to my ear. I still have some difficulty with the tweeter in a comparison with the Heresy, but when not comparing the two it is a reasonable solution. As a speaker I intend to give to my daughter that was more of a 'carpentry practice', I was more than pleasantly surprised and may well keep (move to my office) until I think her ear deserves it (grin). Heresy - I still have an affinity for the two horns on this speaker and most everything above 700- 800hz is a joy (at my age - not having much above 16Khz seems to be of little relevance). As expected the stuff below 700hz is not my favorite part of this speaker. For overall performance, I will be staying with the Heresy. However, there BR portion of Wayne's design is a very pleasant surprise and is why I will be making something akin to a Pi aligned three way with horns for the higher freqs and BR for the lower freqs. Also - even if comparing with the used market, the 2 Pi can be significantly cheaper than Heresy II and an interestingly equitable performer, especially in the Low freqs. Henry
|
|
|