|
|
|
Re: Art Array Improved Crossover [message #60437 is a reply to message #60427] |
Thu, 23 July 2009 10:32 |
|
Wayne Parham
Messages: 18796 Registered: January 2001
|
Illuminati (33rd Degree) |
|
|
Somehow I missed these posts earlier. I'm glad you got around to building that crossover. I'd like to hear it someday, maybe measure it too. Judging by the speakers you've built, I think you and I have the same taste in voicing.
My guess is your room is a little more lively than mine though, because you tend to like a sort of BBC-dip-curve and I like it flatter. We both like full, powerful bass, not over-represented but definitely not weak. Perhaps the new voicing gives you more of that.
To me, what you had done already with the first-order sounded and measured very nice.
So what's with the cables? They're 12guage thick, so that's plenty for long runs. What were the old cables, 14 guage or 16 guage? What did you have in there length-wise, about 10 feet? 20 feet?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Art Array Improved Crossover [message #60457 is a reply to message #60448] |
Fri, 24 July 2009 08:12 |
AudioFred
Messages: 377 Registered: May 2009 Location: Houston
|
Illuminati (1st Degree) |
|
|
Wayne Parham wrote on Thu, 23 July 2009 14:50 | So what do you think is responsible for the difference in cables? Different copper (maybe purity), different numbers/sizes of strands, or maybe winding pattern? Different insulators? How do they compare visually?
|
I don't know. The Belden is quite a bit stiffer, with fewer conductors. Otherwise I have no idea why it sounds better, but it does by a large margin. I have found in general that Belden cable sounds as good as many higher priced "audiophile" cables, the only differene being the lack of snake oil in the Belden.
Here's a link to the product data sheet:
http://www.farnell.com/datasheets/80632.pdf
|
|
|