|
|
Re: Excellent! [message #52191 is a reply to message #52190] |
Tue, 10 June 2008 16:19 |
PaulW
Messages: 71 Registered: May 2009 Location: UK
|
Viscount |
|
|
Yes they are Bottlehead Paramours - I also use the Seduction Phonostage and Foreplay Pre. OK, the sound, well I have to say that on initial start-up I was disappointed with the results of all my hard labour. The sound was dull, dynamically restrained, with a shut in quality to the vocals, with the overall sound best described as small, bass had a thrummed quality rather than well delineated and was not too clean - not a good start to say the least. So, do these need to be run for a period of break in? I connected them to my AV amp and used a CD system 'burn-in' track on repeat overnight and throughout today. This evening they are far better, there is more punch to the sound, things like 'mark trees' have a real shimmer to them and Hi-Hat rides are clearly discernible from normal cymbal strokes as are both rim and centre strokes. Vocals are open and detailed with good timbre and emotion, a vast improvement on yesterday and I’m far happier. The only issue is that thrummy bass – most of the time it’s fine so I suspect this is a room interaction. The problem would appear to be in the low 100hz region (110-140) at a guess, but I’ve no way of really measuring this, but I suspect a DIY panel resonator will be on the cards shortly, though I’ll wait until I feel the speakers have stopped changing. I also suspect a MagneQuest transformer upgrade wouldn’t go amiss to aid overall control as well. I don't know if any of the above has been noted by other builders, but the change over the last 20 hours has been quite dramatic to say the least! Paul.
|
|
|
Re: Excellent! [message #52194 is a reply to message #52191] |
Wed, 11 June 2008 00:54 |
|
Wayne Parham
Messages: 18792 Registered: January 2001
|
Illuminati (33rd Degree) |
|
|
Glad to hear they're coming along.I'm sure you've done this but I'll suggest it just in case - it never hurts to double check connections - Check the wiring and make sure the bass bin, midhorn and tweeter are all connected to the right outputs on the crossover PCB and also make sure they're all phased properly. If you connect the midhorn to the bass bin output and the bass bin to the midhorn output, it will sound pretty unnatural, but you might not catch it right away like if you reversed woofer and tweeter connections. You'll still have bass and midrange if cross-connected, but the bass is weak and the midrange is hollow sounding and rolled off early. So check that and make sure it's right. Also, check the polarity of every connection. The midhorn and tweeter in particular, if phased right sounds like a single driver, if not, sounds like the tweeter and midhorn are independent of each other, you can really hear the disconnect. So check everything and make sure it is all connected properly.
|
|
|
Re: Excellent! [message #52198 is a reply to message #52194] |
Wed, 11 June 2008 19:36 |
PaulW
Messages: 71 Registered: May 2009 Location: UK
|
Viscount |
|
|
When using the 'burn-in' track you can clearly hear the individual drivers coming into play both individually and together then individually as it sweeps up through the frequency, similarly I used a phase check track with only one pair of drivers connected (bass, mid, then treble) to ensure they were wired in phase, then connected them all up. All connections are correct and tight as are the drivers and the speakers continue to improve. That is except in the bass which still sounds thrummy, but now is also loose and a bit boxy, indeed quite indistinct. It feels well integrated with the overall sound, but is difficult to follow, even on well known tracks. Still, early days and I do feel there may be a significant room interaction element. If I get a chance this weekend I'll put together a box resonator trap aimed at about a 100hz, so should have an effect over about 50-200hz and see what that does. Paul
|
|
|
Re: Excellent! [message #52199 is a reply to message #52198] |
Wed, 11 June 2008 19:58 |
|
Wayne Parham
Messages: 18792 Registered: January 2001
|
Illuminati (33rd Degree) |
|
|
Very good, please keep us posted. The seven π loudspeaker has long been my favorite, it measures very nice and always sounded great to me too. Hope it is as pleasant for you as it has been for me.As an aside, what kind of floor and walls do you have? In America, many homes have concrete slabs and walls are drywall mounted on wood frames. This is pretty good because the concrete slab is non-resonant and the drywall vibrates enough to damp room modes. Two kinds of rooms cause the most trouble: 1. Rooms with hardwood floors suspended over a crawlspace. This makes a resonant chamber with the floor acting like a drum head. It's impossible to get bass right in a room like this without doing something to fix the resonance of the suspended floor and crawlspace. 2. Solid concrete walls like in a basement room form well defined room modes, and that makes damper panels and/or multiple subs a requirement for good bass sound. I have also seen plenty of homes with plaster walls that are rigid. This is like concrete and doesn't provide much damping. If you have rigid walls, these may help:
|
|
|
Re: Excellent! [message #52200 is a reply to message #52199] |
Wed, 11 June 2008 21:00 |
PaulW
Messages: 71 Registered: May 2009 Location: UK
|
Viscount |
|
|
The floor is what is known as beam and block, this is a series of reinforced concrete beams (small cavity below) with a cross-section like an upside down 'T'. Between the beams resting on the 'arms' of the T's are concrete blocks (hence the name) and over this is 3 inches of dense foam insulation, followed by seam glued 3/4" tongue and groove chipboard. The walls are cavity block work (from outside to in - 4"brick, 4" air space, but with 2" insulation and a 4" concrete block) with an internal face of 1/2" plaster board held on with random 'blobs' of adhesive with probably about a 3/4" gap where there is no adhesive, this is then plastered over - so as 2 above I suspect. The room itself would appear (based on it's dimensions) to have a modal region between 32 to 177Hz with no multiples but some close clusters in the 60's, 90's and 130's and it's these I feel I need to tackle.
I aim to build a 4'x 2'x 4" (WxHxD) panel trap and site this between the speaker, but clear of the wall by about 4 inches, as this is the only easy place to put it - I've got quite a lot packed into this room! I don't know if this will really help, or even if this is the real issue, but the speakers would be more likely to go rather than undertake major remedial work to resolve this issue. Paul
|
|
|
Room modes [message #52201 is a reply to message #52200] |
Wed, 11 June 2008 22:58 |
|
Wayne Parham
Messages: 18792 Registered: January 2001
|
Illuminati (33rd Degree) |
|
|
Sounds like a well-built structure, but it also sounds very rigid. I'll bet your room modes are very well defined. If that's the case then any speaker with some bass will energize the modes and they'll stand out.Best thing to smooth room modes is multiple subs and/or room damping. Bass damper panels will improve damping, and that's an important way to smooth room modes. Since every boundary of your room is very rigid, I think damping should be added regardless of anything else you do. No speaker can really sound good in the modal region, at least not a single speaker or a pair. They'll either be weak in the bass and so not energize the modes, or they'll put enough energy into the room to make those nodes stand out like a sore thumb. So I think damping panels should be done, no matter what other steps you might take. Since you say your room is packed, I'm assuming that adding a couple more woofers isn't an option, but if it is, it's another good solution. A couple of LAB12 woofers, each in a 4.5ft3 cabinet, added to what you have now would greatly smooth the modes. You could easily model the room with CARA, trying a few positions to find where energy distribution is smoothest. Either panel dampers or multiple bass sound sources will provide improvements in the form of smoother bass, but both together will most certainly provide the best bass possible.
|
|
|
More woofers - that I didn't expect! [message #52210 is a reply to message #52201] |
Thu, 12 June 2008 15:36 |
PaulW
Messages: 71 Registered: May 2009 Location: UK
|
Viscount |
|
|
A couple more woofers! Doesn't that also mean another amp and some form of filtering, with all the asociated problems with balancing the relative output? I could accommodate two more boxes (and probably not to different from the cost of some room treatment) but not to sure about wanting another amp to drive them! The speakers are still getting better by the day and I've just had a musician friend round who was thrilled by the sound. I still aim to put together a bass resonator (should have enough material in stock as it were) and maybe look to some foam bass traps for the corners a little later. Paul
|
|
|
Re: More woofers - helps to smooth room modes [message #52211 is a reply to message #52210] |
Thu, 12 June 2008 16:47 |
|
Wayne Parham
Messages: 18792 Registered: January 2001
|
Illuminati (33rd Degree) |
|
|
You could connect pairs of woofers together and drive each pair with a single channel. This isn't to increase output, it's to smooth room modes.One of these times, if you're inclined to experiment, grab a copy of CARA and model your room. Place woofers in various places in the room to find what makes the most uniform response. Simulation takes just a few seconds, and it will show the modes in the room as a function of frequency. It even makes an animation to demonstrate the modes with a simulated frequency sweep. I would start by placing the two additional woofers in different positions in all three planes. One configuration that seemed to generally work well for me was to separate woofer pairs by a few feet, one higher off the ground than the other. Try other configurations too.
|
|
|