fostex rear loaded horn design [message #20552] |
Fri, 17 December 2004 10:10 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bd0ac/bd0ac06bc0716245c70e1d7ca4a193e4fbe25374" alt="Go to next message Go to next message" |
jim denton
Messages: 162 Registered: May 2009
|
Master |
|
|
Building the Fostex design for the 206---this plan calls for the T90 super tweeter---(cost $140 each) If I study the spec's to match as close possible could I not find a suitable tweeter as least expense-----these dang tweeters cost more than the drivers!!!! JD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: fostex rear loaded horn design [message #20609 is a reply to message #20601] |
Thu, 13 January 2005 13:07 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/413e0/413e00f5cba1f3b2b5107f9dcfe0ee2b05c7be55" alt="Go to previous message Go to previous message" |
robertG
Messages: 24 Registered: May 2009
|
Chancellor |
|
|
TAD drivers are way too expensive for me! But I would love to compare these to some exotic Fostex drivers (T925). You are right about the fact that it's difficult to get a flat response with that kind of crossover. On the other hand, placement is the key to balanced sound. Both FR and ST are very directive and output drops quite a bit off-axis (almost 20DB @ 30 deg. @ 20 kHz for the ST), so with proper placement (or misplacement), it's still possible to get great sound without using resistors and/or radical Xover slopes. I mean, with the ST sitting on top, it's possible to have a slight toe-in for the ST and no toe-in for the FR driver.
|
|
|