Home » Audio » Speaker » Jordan JX92S questions?
Jordan JX92S questions? [message #14672] Wed, 11 August 2004 20:13 Go to next message
Norris Wilson is currently offline  Norris Wilson
Messages: 361
Registered: May 2009
Grand Master
Hi everyone,

I have been looking at the Jordan JX92S transmission line project on the Jordan website. The only damping material shown to be used on their site, is felt behind the driver. I have not built a transmission line speaker before, but I thought that stuffing the line is important.

Has anyone here built this Jordan design?
If so, could you help with the proper stuffing material and quanity?

Also, has anyone experimented or built a speaker system using mutiple Jordan JX92S drivers in an array or multiples of two or more?
Possibly used multiple drivers with a modified varient of the transmission line project?

And finally, has anyone been able to integrate a subwoofer successfully with the Jordan JX92S speaker? If so, what model or specific design worked well, DIY or commercial units, self powered or drone with active or passive crossover ect?
The Seas 10" aluminum woofer looks like it could be a good match with the Jordan.

Any and all help and sugestions will be greatly appreciated.

Thanks

Norris Wilson

Stuffing thickness [message #14673 is a reply to message #14672] Wed, 11 August 2004 21:01 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Ralph is currently offline  Ralph
Messages: 75
Registered: May 2009
Viscount
I can't hear any difference using thin felt. You need thicker material for it to work IMHO.
Ralph

Re: Stuffing thickness [message #14675 is a reply to message #14673] Wed, 11 August 2004 21:56 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Norris Wilson is currently offline  Norris Wilson
Messages: 361
Registered: May 2009
Grand Master
Hi Ralph,
I was wondering if a thicker, possibly .5 inch felt would be enough to load the TL properly? Is the felt or stuffing behind the driver all that is needed?
Thanks
Norris

Re: Stuffing thickness [message #14676 is a reply to message #14675] Wed, 11 August 2004 22:53 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Ralph is currently offline  Ralph
Messages: 75
Registered: May 2009
Viscount
This is my litmus test. Take a plastic drinking cup and talk into it. Listen to your voice. Next put your stuffing material in the cup and do the same thing. You should hear a big difference. If not, the stuffing doesn't work.
Ralph

Re: Stuffing thickness [message #14677 is a reply to message #14676] Thu, 12 August 2004 06:35 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Bill Fitzmaurice is currently offline  Bill Fitzmaurice
Messages: 335
Registered: May 2009
Grand Master
If the line is not completely stuffed throughout its length it will not perform as a transmission line; I'm not familiar with the design in question, but the lack of full stuffing makes me question it.

A transmission line by dint of its design will develop a number of resonant modes throughout its length; it is critical that those modes be damped with stuffing or the response curve will be quite erratic. When properly stuffed a transmission line will have a smooth frequency response with no internal reflective modes and an impedance sweep will show a single impedance peak at the line frequency with no peaks anywhere else. Without adequate stiuffing it will exhibit numerous impedance peaks and the response will also be marred by a series of peaks and dips.



Re: Stuffing thickness [message #14678 is a reply to message #14677] Thu, 12 August 2004 19:20 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Manualblock is currently offline  Manualblock
Messages: 4973
Registered: May 2009
Illuminati (13th Degree)
Hi Bill; When you say full; How would you determine the exact amount of stuffing and is placement critical along the line? Or do you stuff the line to a certain density and that will address the nodes? Is there a specific density required of the material itself that is optimal for this application? Thanks, J.R.

Re: Jordan JX92S - I'm going to take a wild guess here... [message #14680 is a reply to message #14672] Fri, 13 August 2004 05:01 Go to previous messageGo to next message
wunhuanglo is currently offline  wunhuanglo
Messages: 912
Registered: May 2009
Illuminati (2nd Degree)
After looking at the plans, I think it's a matter of "completeness".

The plan says that the vented version is depicted. It also shows what changes to make to the woodwork to convert it into a transmission line.

In the other plans shown, they talk about using long fiber wool compressed to half-volume. I think that what they neglected to say is that you need the same thing if you elect to go with the transmission line configuration in the cabinet you're looking at.

Thanks wunhuanglo! [message #14681 is a reply to message #14680] Fri, 13 August 2004 05:59 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Norris Wilson is currently offline  Norris Wilson
Messages: 361
Registered: May 2009
Grand Master
It is obvious that I did not read the published information thorough enough to catch it all. This is close enough to get the speaker acomplished.
And thanks to all who contributed to my inquiry.
Norris Wilson

Re: Stuffing thickness [message #14682 is a reply to message #14678] Fri, 13 August 2004 11:24 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Bill Fitzmaurice is currently offline  Bill Fitzmaurice
Messages: 335
Registered: May 2009
Grand Master
There are some formulas for the amount of stuffing, according to the material, F3 and other considerations, but they aren't terribly precise. The best way to do it is to run an impedance plot. With no stuffing or insufficient stuffing you'll have one large peak at the Fo and a number of smaller ones above it, as I noted before. When a sufficient stuffing density is reached only the high spike will remain, with the rest suppressed, along with the resonances that caused them. With polyester pillow stuffing you'll usually find that sufficient stuffing to throughly fill the line without compresssing it is sufficient.

A line with inadequate stuffing has not only ragged response but the roll off below Fo is at 12dB, the same as a vented box. Properly stuffed a line rolls off below Fo at 6dB, so you have the bass response at Fo of a vented box but the slower rolloff and cone control of a sealed box below that.

sealed 12db vented 24db [message #14683 is a reply to message #14682] Fri, 13 August 2004 11:48 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
spnman is currently offline  spnman
Messages: 14
Registered: May 2009
Chancellor
If aligned for max flat response, doesn't a typical vented box rolloff at 24db/oct and sealed at 12db/oct?

Previous Topic: Straight 8
Next Topic: T36 Cerwin Vega "Earthquake" bins
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Tue Nov 19 08:36:53 CST 2024

Sponsoring Organizations

DIY Audio Projects
DIY Audio Projects
OddWatt Audio
OddWatt Audio
Pi Speakers
Pi Speakers
Prosound Shootout
Prosound Shootout
Miller Audio
Miller Audio
Tubes For Amps
TubesForAmps.com

Lone Star Audiofest