3D Sound [message #69112] |
Mon, 22 August 2011 02:54 |
Hannah
Messages: 15 Registered: August 2011
|
Chancellor |
|
|
I stumbled into a video in the internet portraying a 3D sound. I can't distinguish how the sound became 3D so I would like to ask here what is 3D sound? It states in the video that it is different from surround so how does it differ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: 3D Sound [message #69919 is a reply to message #69915] |
Fri, 28 October 2011 19:57 |
|
Wayne Parham
Messages: 18792 Registered: January 2001
|
Illuminati (33rd Degree) |
|
|
What source material do you use? I mean, I know the Carver is synthesized because I have one too, a CT-17. It can be put into one of several modes. But as for binaural, do you seek out recordings made specifically for this approach? Or do you always use a processor?
Honestly, I always leave my Carver in the straight-through mode. I never turn on the synthesizer modes. They're neat, and can make a cool effect. But I just prefer the signals to be unmodified.
The only thing I don't like about my CT-17 is its goofy dual tape interface. For some reason, they chose a daisy-chain approach instead of the more straightforward A-B setup. I think Bob must've smoked his breakfast that morning. But it's the best multi-channel audio/video preamp/processor of its day, in my opinion. In general, I like the way Bob Carver thinks, and I like his products too.
|
|
|
|
Re: 3D Sound [message #69922 is a reply to message #69921] |
Fri, 28 October 2011 20:55 |
|
Wayne Parham
Messages: 18792 Registered: January 2001
|
Illuminati (33rd Degree) |
|
|
Oh, yes, I know. It's described in the Carver patent.
I have the same settings in my processor, and I've tried the setup. So I know what you are experiencing - a sort of headphone-like imaging from loudspeakers. It's very good, but the benefits are limited to an extremely small listening position. Anywhere else, for all other listeners, it is somewhat artificial sounding. Like you said, the angles have to be perfect, or the whole thing falls apart. You must be directly in the "special spot" for this approach to work. I kind of don't like that.
This is how I prefer to setup my system:
My approach also gives excellent imaging, and provides a much wider "sweet spot". The listening area is truly as wide as the couch. I like my front channels to be very directional with a high ratio of direct-to-reflected sound. The surrounds I like just the opposite. In fact, I found that pointing them at a wall and reflected back towards the listeners works great. Point the (side and rear) surrounds so the angle of incidence directs the reflection generally towards the listening area.
|
|
|
|