| 
		
 | 
	| 
		
 | 
	| 
		
 | 
	| 
		
 | 
	| 
		
 | 
	| 
		
 | 
	| 
		
 | 
	
		
		
			| Re: Why do appliances fail at bad times [message #96045 is a reply to message #96043] | 
			Thu, 06 October 2022 09:14    | 
		 
		
			
				
				
				  | 
					
						  
						Wayne Parham
						 Messages: 18979 Registered: January 2001 
						
					 | 
					Illuminati  (33rd Degree)  | 
					 | 
		 
		 
	 | 
 
	
		 
I hear you, Bruce.  I much prefer equipment designed and built to last for decades.  All of my favorite gear lasts longer than a lifetime.  That's how everything was built prior to WWII, and most stuff was built that way up through the 1970s.  Most stuff made after that is built to last a few years only, and then discarded and replaced rather than repaired. 
 
When I was young - in my first jobs, while still in school - electronics was still repaired at the component level, but there was a new trend of replacing a subassembly and sending the defective one to a depo that would repair it at the component level.  I resisted that 'cause it seemed like "cheating," and almost always repaired things at a component level myself. 
 
When I started my business, my main focus was to design custom communications and industrial control modules for customers like Walmart, Whirlpool and Fedex.  But I also wrote service contracts with customers that owned Data General computer systems.  I would purchase functional used systems and equipment for use as spares, and when customer equipment broke, I would replace an assembly in the field with spare equipment I owned, and then would bring it back to my office to repair.  So I borrowed the depo approach, using it to save time at the customer site. 
 
I can understand the depo approach, and repairing things at an assembly level in the field.  I can even understand the economics of making an assembly so cheaply that it is discarded rather than repaired.  I don't like that as much 'cause it nudges us closer to the "replaceable junk" mentality that we now seem to embrace.  But it does make economic sense for the manufacturers.  I just don't like it.  It makes everything just plain cheap. 
 
It changes how people treat their equipment too.  When people make a purchase of durable equipment - something built to last - they tend to take care of it.  But when they buy a disposable item, they tend to trash it. 
 
I think it has even influenced our social mindset.  I think it adds to the entitlement and narcissism that's kind of built-in to the culture these days. 
 
So glad I grew up back in the 1960s. 
		
		
		
 |  
	| 
		
	 | 
 
 
 | 
	| 
		
 | 
	| 
		
 |