Home » Audio » Thermionic Emissions » Quick and simple formulae for Ra
Quick and simple formulae for Ra [message #8762] Wed, 26 January 2005 14:14 Go to next message
Damir is currently offline  Damir
Messages: 1005
Registered: May 2009
Illuminati (2nd Degree)
In transformer - coupled output stage with output triode we must do a graphical load - line analysis to find load resistance Ra (primary resistance, or reflected secondary load). Ra is max. AC voltage "swing" divided with max. current "swing" through the load, or

Ra = Ua pp/ Ia pp = Ua p / Ia p = Ua rms / Ia rms

Power at the primary: Pa=Ua rms^2 / Ra = Ia rms^2 * Ra = Ua rms*Ia rms

Note that Ia p = Ia dc, Ia pp = 2*Ia dc, Ia rms = Ia dc / 1,4142

The "goal" is to avoid graphic analysis, and find the simple formulae, "good enough" for "everyday use".

Our triode output tube with its "bias" Ugk, can have max. peak AC input voltage in class A1 equal to Ugk, or Ugk rms = Ugk/1,4142.
With very high load Ra, AC voltage at the load Ra is:

Ua = mu * Ugk

But, our "real" load Ra form voltage divider with tube plate resistance rp, and voltage at the load Ra is actually lower:

Ua = (mu * Ugk) / (1 + rp/Ra)

And from Ra = Ua / Ia, we have Ua = Ra * Ia

If we put together these equations:

Ra*Ia = (mu*Ugk)/(1+rp/Ra), and Ra*Ia = (mu*Ugk)/((Ra+rp)/Ra), and

Ra*Ia = (Ra*mu*Ugk)/(Ra+rp), and Ia = (mu*Ugk)/(Ra+rp), and

Ra+rp = mu*Ugk/Ia, and finally:

Ra = ((mu * Ugk) / Ia) - rp FORMULAE FOR Ra

What does this mean in practice? If we have some DC operating point for our output triode, say 300B - Uak=400V, Ia=80mA, Ugk=-85V and we know (about) rp and mu from tube manuals (simplification, assumed that rp and mu are constant, but error is minimal and negligible). Say, rp = 700 Ohms and mu = 3,9. Then:

Ra = ((3,9 * 85) / 0,08) - 700 = 3443,75 Ohms ~3,5 kOhms

In agreement with load - line analysis and tube manual data!

Re: Quick and simple formulae for Ra [message #8763 is a reply to message #8762] Wed, 26 January 2005 14:44 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Manualblock is currently offline  Manualblock
Messages: 4973
Registered: May 2009
Illuminati (13th Degree)
Thanks for taking the time to do these tutorials. It is very kind and generous and well appreciated.

and now to include "air resistance" [message #8765 is a reply to message #8762] Thu, 27 January 2005 19:14 Go to previous messageGo to next message
PakProtector is currently offline  PakProtector
Messages: 935
Registered: May 2009
Illuminati (2nd Degree)
a.k.a. changing plate z. Drawing the 3k5 load line on the WE 300B curves shows a significant variation in plate z from one end to the other. Less variation from idle to g1=0, but from idle to g1=cut-off the variation is more pronounced and damping factor goes from 5:1( 3k5 load/700R plate z ) to a significantly lower number.

I suspect this effect is responsible for some of what is referred to as SE magic. change in output z dependant on position on the waveform. Looks to vary a lot more than Class A PP. I do prefer to listen to PP power stages, and am always searching for an answer to the 'WHY' question...
regards,
Douglas

Re: and now to include "air resistance" [message #8768 is a reply to message #8765] Sun, 30 January 2005 01:46 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Damir is currently offline  Damir
Messages: 1005
Registered: May 2009
Illuminati (2nd Degree)
Wonderful world of tubes .
Formula has it`s limitations, it is based on the analysis of the typical DHT output stage, where close to the max. power is the goal, and is assumed that current swing through the load is maximum, or from zero to the value 2*Ia dc. Formula gives such Ra with Ua/Ia proportion as described, and is not effective in the area close to the Ug=0 line - resultant load line is too steep...
For example, for AD1 tube (close to 2A3), OP 250V/-45V/60mA and rp~670 Ohms, mu~4 , Ra is:
Ra=(Ugk*mu)/Ia - rp = (45*4)/0,06 - 670 = 2330 Ohms
Just like reccomended Ra=2k3 in manuals. But, if you want the "extreme" OP, say 100V/-5V/90mA, then Ia can`t "swing" from 0-2Ia dc value and formula can`t give the "right" result, you must "compensate" it with real current swing...

Re: and now to include "air resistance" [message #8772 is a reply to message #8765] Sun, 30 January 2005 10:32 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Manualblock is currently offline  Manualblock
Messages: 4973
Registered: May 2009
Illuminati (13th Degree)
Do you guy's agree with this? In Class A1 PP The magnetizing effects of the DC on the Iron core cancels out. Therefor there can be no DC saturation in the core of the output trans regardless of how great the average plate current may be. The incremental inductance will be higher and therefor will improve low-freq response. Large variable plate current will produce proportionate changes in the magnetic flux rather than be distorted by the saturation bend in the magnetisation curve of the iron.

Re: and now to include "air resistance" [message #8774 is a reply to message #8772] Sun, 30 January 2005 11:02 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Damir is currently offline  Damir
Messages: 1005
Registered: May 2009
Illuminati (2nd Degree)
My toroidal PP OPTs have Lp=490H, and my "C"-core SE OPTs have Lp=22H, both are 3k primary devices:-). Later can stand 80 mA of DC current, but former maybe few mA before degradation of sound, and few more mA - DC saturation buzz. DC cancelation/adjusting between the PP pair is critical, depends of the OPT - toroids are more sensitive.
High primary inductance is one of the most important factors in getting "clean" bass/overall sound, low Lp OPTs sounds "warmer" (more distorted, if you like)...
There`s entire chapter about that in the book "Modern High-End Valve Amplifiers" by Menno Van der Veen - higly recommendable.

Re: and now to include "air resistance" [message #8776 is a reply to message #8774] Sun, 30 January 2005 12:48 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Manualblock is currently offline  Manualblock
Messages: 4973
Registered: May 2009
Illuminati (13th Degree)
Much Thanks; I guess that's the book to read.

Re: and now to include "air resistance" [message #8777 is a reply to message #8776] Sun, 30 January 2005 13:15 Go to previous messageGo to next message
PakProtector is currently offline  PakProtector
Messages: 935
Registered: May 2009
Illuminati (2nd Degree)
Hey-Hey!!!,
You can still saturate a core with AC. It is inversely propprtional to freq. Drop into the subsonic and start increasing the voltage, and you can damn well be sure, at some point you'll run out of core.

AC flux is also proportional to turns count squared, and to core area. This is why you should be sure that the audio PS Iron is wound with enough turns on ots primary, other wise it will hum and buzz with no load. This is because the bloody core is satruating( it will get hot too soon enough ).
regards,
Douglas

Re: and now to include "air resistance" [message #8781 is a reply to message #8777] Sun, 30 January 2005 15:32 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Manualblock is currently offline  Manualblock
Messages: 4973
Registered: May 2009
Illuminati (13th Degree)
Thanks T; even though this engineering is mathematically derived; there are so many Opinions that for a novice it is daunting. Maybe opinion is too strong a word but there seems to be so many preferences, lets say.
In the above equation is Ra called Ro in some textbooks?

opinions [message #8782 is a reply to message #8781] Sun, 30 January 2005 16:01 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
PakProtector is currently offline  PakProtector
Messages: 935
Registered: May 2009
Illuminati (2nd Degree)
my opinion is that until there is some easily( and universaly ) recongnized abbreviation, that it should be explained in every text before( or immediately after ) using it.
regards,
Douglas

Previous Topic: Amp Kits
Next Topic: PSUDii tips
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Fri Nov 08 21:20:05 CST 2024

Sponsoring Organizations

DIY Audio Projects
DIY Audio Projects
OddWatt Audio
OddWatt Audio
Pi Speakers
Pi Speakers
Prosound Shootout
Prosound Shootout
Miller Audio
Miller Audio
Tubes For Amps
TubesForAmps.com

Lone Star Audiofest