Home » Audio » Thermionic Emissions » New Production Tung Sol 6550, Penta KT88s (Concerning Audio Quality)
Re: New Production Tung Sol 6550, Penta KT88s [message #97820 is a reply to message #96284] |
Tue, 02 July 2024 13:50 |
|
Wayne Parham
Messages: 18788 Registered: January 2001
|
Illuminati (33rd Degree) |
|
|
I've been meaning to reply to this thread for a long time, but keep forgetting. When a post is made here, I read it, make a mental note to respond when I get time, then eventually forget 'til the next post.
I have an Audio Note Kit 2, which uses a 6550 tube wired as a triode and run Class A. I love it, but it did show some oddities over the years, some of which may have been due to things other than the basic circuit.
One of which was a predisposition to draw excessive output circuit current after a tube had been run for a few years. I use this amplifier often, so a few years means several thousand hours. At that time, it would usually start overheating the cathode resistor. This, of course, raised the voltage across it and its bypass capacitor. After a few years, I installed a 1/4A fuse in series with the cathode resistor, and that was magic. When a fuse pops now, I swap both fuses and both tubes. That makes everything very predictable.
I have noticed, though, that after moving from Tulsa to Bella Vista, the excessive current problem seems to happen less often. Seems like we've gone from maybe every four years to every six or maybe even longer. It just seems rarer now.
But none of that is scientific at all. I haven't measured the voltage in either place, haven't looked at the waveform, nothing. I mean, I've seen both voltage and waveform in both places. From time to time, I've needed to troubleshoot something and on those occasions, I look at power sometimes. But just for a few seconds, just enough to get a reading, and no real deep dive into what's happening. Just noting that I've got 170V peak, sine looks smooth, nothing deeper than that. In fact, I'm surprised that Bella Vista power is "better" than Tulsa 'cause no other utility services are.
Anyway, all that was just a qualifier to show what "m working with when I talk about 6550 and KT88 tubes in my particular setup.
For me - I have tended to really like Tung-Sol and Electro-Harmonix for new production tubes. They both sound great and they both behave. They last a long time.
I also have RCA and Tung-Sol 6550 tubes that were manufactured decades ago. They're strong, almost could be called NOS but they have been used. Just lightly. They're too precious for me to run full-time, all the time.
I like Svetlana tubes too, but for whatever reason, I don't like 'em as much as the Tung-Sol and Electro-Harmonix tubes. It may just be psychological, because without the Cyrillic letter on them, they're "pretenders" to me. And these days, I'm not sure I'd want the "real thing" if it existed anyway. So that bias may have nothing at all to do with quality.
The one that really stands out as a "bad part" for my amplifier is the JJ 6550. It's a "snap-crackle-pop" tube for me. Many of them actually make strange noises in my Audio Note circuit and they always fail very rapidly, like in months. Not sure what's up with that, but it has happened more than once.
This seems to track with many of the KT88 tubes as well. I have a handful of different brands, and I'm sure some are better than others in my application. But all of the KT88 tubes seem to fail sooner than 6550 tubes. I'm not sure what the actual structural differences are, but KT88s don't seem to fare as well as 6550s in my Audio Note Kit 2.
|
|
|
|
|
New Production Tung Sol 6550, Penta KT88s
By: positron on Wed, 18 January 2023 23:01
|
|
|
Re: New Production Tung Sol 6550, Penta KT88s
By: positron on Sat, 21 January 2023 18:24
|
|
|
Re: New Production Tung Sol 6550, Penta KT88s
|
|
|
Re: New Production Tung Sol 6550, Penta KT88s
By: positron on Sat, 21 January 2023 21:33
|
|
|
Re: New Production Tung Sol 6550, Penta KT88s
By: positron on Sun, 22 January 2023 17:28
|
|
|
Re: New Production Tung Sol 6550, Penta KT88s
By: gofar99 on Mon, 23 January 2023 20:25
|
|
|
Re: Demagnetizing Tung Sol 6550, Penta KT88s
By: positron on Mon, 23 January 2023 22:12
|
|
|
Re: Demagnetizing Tung Sol 6550, Penta KT88s
By: positron on Tue, 21 February 2023 22:45
|
|
|
Re: Demagnetizing Tung Sol 6550, Penta KT88s
By: positron on Mon, 26 February 2024 21:44
|
|
|
Re: Demagnetizing Tung Sol 6550, Penta KT88s
|
|
|
Re: Demagnetizing Tung Sol 6550, Penta KT88s
By: gofar99 on Fri, 21 June 2024 20:50
|
|
|
Re: Demagnetizing Tung Sol 6550, Penta KT88s
|
|
|
Re: Demagnetizing Tung Sol 6550, Penta KT88s
By: gofar99 on Fri, 28 June 2024 20:46
|
|
|
Re: Demagnetizing Tung Sol 6550, Penta KT88s
|
|
|
Re: Demagnetizing Tung Sol 6550, Penta KT88s
By: positron on Thu, 16 March 2023 15:30
|
|
|
Re: Demagnetizing Tung Sol 6550, Penta KT88s
By: gofar99 on Thu, 16 March 2023 21:28
|
|
|
Re: Demagnetizing Tung Sol 6550, Penta KT88s
By: positron on Thu, 16 March 2023 22:17
|
|
|
Re: New Production Tung Sol 6550, Penta KT88s
|
|
|
Re: New Production Tung Sol 6550, Penta KT88s
|
|
|
Re: New Production Tung Sol 6550, Penta KT88s
By: gofar99 on Wed, 03 July 2024 11:09
|
|
|
Re: New Production Tung Sol 6550, Penta KT88s
|
|
|
Re: New Production Tung Sol 6550, Penta KT88s
By: positron on Wed, 28 August 2024 23:11
|
|
|
Re: New Production Tung Sol 6550, Penta KT88s
By: positron on Sun, 06 October 2024 22:36
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Wed Nov 27 12:12:44 CST 2024
|