I never listen to it. It is nearly always biased toward one point or another. I much prefer factual information from which I will draw my own conclusions. This relates to the current issue with Sinclair stations. I am appalled by the concept of them using their network to force announcers to push what IMO amounts to the very thing they claim that other stations are doing. Bashing others for their content while ignoring the fact that they are doing exactly the same thing. I can't say if the other stations are factual or not, but having one network insisting that all others aren't is clearly in error. Cut out the name calling and let folks decide for themselves what is real and not. They may make good or bad choices ...but it is their call. I am fearful of the direction this seems to be taking...it reminds me of some historical events that I don't think we need to repeat. Sorry for the diatribe...this topic gets to me.
Smack me Wayne if need be as it is hard to have the moderator intercede in this case.
I'm appalled by everything that's going on with Sinclair right now. For one, if you're a news source and you claim that you're unbiased by attacking other news sources, that doesn't scream "We have no agenda!" to me. Secondly, is there even such a thing as an unbiased news source? What company doesn't find out who their audience is and start creating more products that appeal to them? It's sad that we can't just read/hear the news anymore. Everything's an editorial now. Don't tell me what to think. Tell me what's going on and let me think for myself.
As for the original question, no, I don't really listen to talk radio unless absolutely nothing else is on.
Posting Rules
Members
Search
Help
Register
Login
Get a T-Shirt!
