AudioRoundTable.com: General » Re-mastered vs. Original

Home » Audio » General » Re-mastered vs. Original

Show: Today's Messages :: Navigator :: Polls
E-mail to friend

Re: Re-mastered vs. Original [message #76587 is a reply to message #76564]

Wed, 01 May 2013 15:11

AudioFred
Messages: 377
Registered: May 2009
Location: Houston

Illuminati (1st Degree)

Many remastered CD's sounds considerably worse than the original. Bob Marley's Legend is a good example. A couple of bonus tracks were added (good), but lots of compression was used on the original tracks, increasing the level and reducing the dynamic range by about 6dB (bad). Crying or Very Sad

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Re-mastered vs. Original By: Kingfish on Fri, 26 April 2013 21:27
		Re: Re-mastered vs. Original By: gofar99 on Sat, 27 April 2013 22:38
		Re: Re-mastered vs. Original By: The Noise on Mon, 29 April 2013 04:50
		Re: Re-mastered vs. Original By: Chicken on Tue, 30 April 2013 06:10
		Re: Re-mastered vs. Original By: iLoveiPod on Tue, 30 April 2013 15:57
		Re: Re-mastered vs. Original By: AudioFred on Wed, 01 May 2013 15:11

Previous Topic:	USB Cable with Separate Audio & Power
Next Topic:	Audio Trends

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Sat Aug 02 10:31:11 CDT 2025