DMoore Messages: 58 Registered: May 2009 Location: Seattle
Baron
I think that attempting to describe aspects of any loudspeaker's performance aside from using strictly technical terms is somewhat pointless, since words themselves all convey different meanings to different people; combined with listeners all hearing "different" things or even hearing differently from each other means that we cannot agree on anything "audio", can we?
Unless everyone agrees (without a factual basis for doing so) that a certain aspect of sound should be called (or labelled) X, we are not talking about X. We could be talking about Y but merely refer to it as X. Audio terms (labels) are inherently a flawed form of communication.