AudioRoundTable.com: Speaker » Comb Filtering Misconceptions

Home » Audio » Speaker » Comb Filtering Misconceptions

Show: Today's Messages :: Navigator :: Polls
E-mail to friend

Re: Comb Filtering Misconceptions [message #61149 is a reply to message #61148]

Sun, 11 October 2009 11:58

Wayne Parham
Messages: 18835
Registered: January 2001

Illuminati (33rd Degree)

I think I see what you're saying. In way, you are saying it might make sense to look at the sound field averaged over time. Sort of like dense interference uses multiple acustically distant sources spread out in space, your concept is to look at them spread out over time as well. Then another thing you suggest is that comb filtering may sound interesting, in some cases. I do know that Moog (inventor of the electronic synthesizer) suggested this exact same thing.

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Comb Filtering Misconceptions By: AudioFred on Fri, 02 October 2009 07:56
		Dense Interference By: Wayne Parham on Fri, 02 October 2009 13:24
		Re: Dense Interference By: Keith Larson on Sun, 04 October 2009 09:46
		Audibility of Phase By: Wayne Parham on Sun, 04 October 2009 11:57
		Re: Audibility of Phase By: Keith Larson on Wed, 07 October 2009 16:32
		Re: Audibility of Phase By: Wayne Parham on Wed, 07 October 2009 21:30
		Re: Audibility of Phase By: Keith Larson on Thu, 08 October 2009 10:28
		Audibility of Non-Linearity By: Wayne Parham on Thu, 08 October 2009 20:01
		Re: Comb Filtering Misconceptions By: Keith Larson on Sun, 11 October 2009 10:09
		Re: Comb Filtering Misconceptions By: Wayne Parham on Sun, 11 October 2009 11:58
		Re: Comb Filtering Misconceptions By: Keith Larson on Sun, 11 October 2009 22:29

Previous Topic:	Why does Selah find this to be true?
Next Topic:	second array already in the works

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Mon Feb 17 01:37:35 CST 2025