Home » Audio » Speaker » Why does Selah find this to be true?
Re: Why does Selah find this to be true? [message #61106 is a reply to message #61057] Tue, 29 September 2009 19:29 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
selahaudio is currently offline  selahaudio
Messages: 56
Registered: September 2009
Baron
Marlboro wrote on Mon, 28 September 2009 11:54
Rick Craig>

I've found the 3"-5" woofers work best with the majority of planar / ribbon tweeters in a passive design.


Why have you found this to be the case for you? Measurement? Listening? Critical response of customers or peers?

Just a gut feeling?

I'm more of a WHY GUY; I don't respond well at all to authoritative statements without descriptions of the reasoning or research behind it.


Combination of reasons. Not always customer-driven; in fact, sometimes they're under the assumption that a 80hz-120hz crossover isn't possible with a subwoofer or they want a 7" to run ported and full-range without a sub.

The driver integration to the tweeters and vertical coverage is easier to optimize with the smaller C-T-C spacing and higher crossover point. Measurements and listening experience.
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Symmetrical and asymmetrical slopes in crossovers
Next Topic: Comb Filtering Misconceptions
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Tue Nov 26 18:25:32 CST 2024

Sponsoring Organizations

DIY Audio Projects
DIY Audio Projects
OddWatt Audio
OddWatt Audio
Pi Speakers
Pi Speakers
Prosound Shootout
Prosound Shootout
Miller Audio
Miller Audio
Tubes For Amps
TubesForAmps.com

Lone Star Audiofest