Home » xyzzy » Dungeon » Still no coherent explanation of what legislating from the bench means
Re: Still no coherent explanation of what legislating from the bench means [message #57289 is a reply to message #57286] Wed, 02 November 2005 13:18 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Manualblock is currently offline  Manualblock
Messages: 4973
Registered: May 2009
Illuminati (13th Degree)
How can something be considered unconstitutional if it has no reference in the constitution?
Would it not have to be addressing a constitutional issue to be "Unconstitutional?" Meaning not allowed by the constitution?
That would eliminate most of our body of decided law and bring us back into the 18th century.
Thats why it is "Interpreted", no?
Isn't that their job; to "interpret the meaning of the constitution" as applied to issues before the law?
If you read the document there isn't much there; certainly not anything you could use to finalise any legal position; thats why it is Interpreted.
Using that premise black people would still be 3/5ths of a person. Because at the time the Legislatures' wanted it that way.

 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Yeah but it worked and there will be hearings thank God
Next Topic: Nice; Rumsfeld opens new prisons on the site's of the old concentration camps.
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sun Dec 01 06:14:23 CST 2024

Sponsoring Organizations

DIY Audio Projects
DIY Audio Projects
OddWatt Audio
OddWatt Audio
Pi Speakers
Pi Speakers
Prosound Shootout
Prosound Shootout
Miller Audio
Miller Audio
Tubes For Amps
TubesForAmps.com

Lone Star Audiofest