there is not much if any confusion at all. Everyone knows who Peerless transformers is and it sure would be interesting to see what basis Douglas could use to stake his claim of ownership on of the Peerless brand name. that he has advertised to sell reverse engineered copies at cheap prices of our products? Me thinks, that's not constructive establishment or use of a brand name but actually (as my attorney stated) points in exactly the opposite direction.

and like I said earlier... even if Wayne's hypothesis was correct (and I don't accede that point) it would still pinpoint Doug's use of the brand name as infringing on the rights of yet another party.

msl