| Re: Cindy's single soon [message #56679 is a reply to message #56674] |
Tue, 16 August 2005 11:50   |
Manualblock
Messages: 4973
Registered: May 2009
|
Illuminati (13th Degree) |
|
|
There's no tone here; it's just us. And I admitt to a selfish motive for prolonging this. I need a personal framework within which to try and understand the thinking that dictates what her response to this tragedy should be. A woman who is an avowed anti-war activist loses her son in the war.
How should she behave..what exactly is the protocal here?.
She takes to the streets in her anguish to protest the war by asking for an audience with her elected representative.
And thats wrong..why?
People choose up sides and determine for themselves what her proper rights and behaviours should be.
Exploiting her sons death?? Sorry I just don't get how that can be. Unless you feel she wants money or fame more than she wants her son.
By that logic; anyone against the war has no standing if a person who loses a son has no standing. Then every one who protests the war is exploiting something. And there is no such thing as personal convictions.
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
Members
Search
Help
Register
Login
Get a T-Shirt!
