I see you're trying to change the subject of the debate again. I understand, it's hard to debate something when you are wrong. So here's a tip. When you find you are wrong about something, admit it. Then you can progress to being wrong on the next subject. But lets stick to one at a time ok?You don't like the analogy because it's true. It shows the holes in your theory.
I will also repeat "If you can't supply a source for your numbers then the numbers are not to be considered IMO"