AudioRoundTable.com: Pi Speakers » H-290: flush vs. surface mount?

Home » Sponsored » Pi Speakers » H-290: flush vs. surface mount?

Show: Today's Messages :: Navigator :: Polls
E-mail to friend

Re: H-290: flush vs. surface mount? [message #52498 is a reply to message #52497]

Tue, 19 August 2008 11:18

Wayne Parham
Messages: 18748
Registered: January 2001

Illuminati (33rd Degree)

I like the looks of recessed mounting, but I don't buy into the idea of improved acoustics. The edge is much too thin to matter, in my opinion. So the improvement is purely aesthetic.

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		H-290: flush vs. surface mount? By: Bill Epstein on Tue, 19 August 2008 09:01
		Re: H-290: flush vs. surface mount? By: Wayne Parham on Tue, 19 August 2008 11:18
		Re: H-290: flush vs. surface mount? By: Bill Epstein on Tue, 19 August 2008 11:51
		Re: H-290: flush vs. surface mount? By: Wayne Parham on Tue, 19 August 2008 12:12
		Re: H-290: flush vs. surface mount? By: Wayne-o on Tue, 19 August 2008 18:43
		Re: H-290: flush vs. surface mount? By: Wayne Parham on Tue, 19 August 2008 20:15

Previous Topic:	cone midhorn vs compression mid sound
Next Topic:	20uF Cap for 4Pi Cross Over

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Fri Aug 16 03:35:44 CDT 2024