AudioRoundTable.com: Pi Speakers » Here we go again. Merits of 2" compression vs cone midrange

Home » Sponsored » Pi Speakers » Here we go again. Merits of 2" compression vs cone midrange

Show: Today's Messages :: Navigator :: Polls
E-mail to friend

Re: Here we go again. Merits of 2" compression vs cone midrange [message #44689 is a reply to message #44686]

Mon, 31 May 2004 19:45

HenryW
Messages: 44
Registered: May 2009

Baron

Well - I for one am a horn guy. I really like the cone mid range sound and intellectually buy in to the Xover not being in such a critical frequency range. But when my ear hears them side by side the cone starts to sound a tad less dynamic and the brain says the sound is soft (in places).

I would take a shot at maybe a 500hz compression/horn as an alternative if I want to hit a bit of that lower freq with the mid. I do enjoy many variations of mid horns that Xover in the 500 - 800hz range, so I could probably be a 'registered' biased person...

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Here we go again. Merits of 2" compression vs cone midrange By: GarMan on Mon, 31 May 2004 15:09
		Re: Here we go again. Merits of 2" compression vs cone midrange By: Adam on Mon, 31 May 2004 16:30
		Sketchy about crossover points By: GarMan on Mon, 31 May 2004 20:38
		Re: Sketchy about crossover points By: Wayne Parham on Mon, 31 May 2004 23:29
		Re: Here we go again. Merits of 2" compression vs cone midrange By: HenryW on Mon, 31 May 2004 19:45
		Re: Here we go again. Merits of 2" compression vs cone midrange By: GrantMarshall on Tue, 01 June 2004 05:35

Previous Topic:	studio 2 pi
Next Topic:	Two Pi Plans

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Fri Aug 02 03:11:30 CDT 2024