Home » Sponsored » Pi Speakers » 2nd ordrer Butterworth vs 3rd order Butterworth
Re: 2nd ordrer Butterworth vs 3rd order Butterworth [message #37901 is a reply to message #37894] Tue, 20 August 2002 14:32 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Wayne Parham is currently offline  Wayne Parham
Messages: 18791
Registered: January 2001
Illuminati (33rd Degree)
The points I've tried to make with respect to passive second and third-order filters is they are more prone to peaking from too small a load than first order. In fact, increasing the load resistance on a first-order filter just shifts the crossover point. There will be some peaking because of the reactive nature of the load, but the R1/R2/C1 network worn't work on a first order the same it does on a second or third. It works equally well on second or third or higher. The thing on these higher order networks is you have to consider the phase shift, which is a separate matter. The higher the slope, the less the overlap band, so vertical nulls will be present over a smaller frequency range. All these kinds of things have to be considered in additon to how the R1/R2/C1 network interacts with the base band-splitter filter.
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: 2 Pi Piezo Tweeter Choices
Next Topic: eminence psd-2002 vs selenium d300ti
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sat Nov 30 19:31:56 CST 2024

Sponsoring Organizations

DIY Audio Projects
DIY Audio Projects
OddWatt Audio
OddWatt Audio
Pi Speakers
Pi Speakers
Prosound Shootout
Prosound Shootout
Miller Audio
Miller Audio
Tubes For Amps
TubesForAmps.com

Lone Star Audiofest