Sounds good Earl.
Look forward to it.
I think what is critically missing is an article that simultaneously:
a) is based on, and cites, peer reviewed studies that have been published in journals or proceedings,
b) is readable by advanced hobbyists with limited technical background
c) presents a comprehensive list of measurements that actually do effect subjective perception (again backed up by real studies).
Such an article would be very difficult to write, and has not been done because of the abundance of comerical interests and scientifially challenged manufacturers/dealers, not to mention reviewers. Peter Aczel attempted such articles many times, and I think came quite close, though he pretty mcuh only cited his own & his associate's experiences, and his data was never published anywhere, except the audio critic of course. To hi credit, he is the only person I know who actually introduced scientists like Floyd Toole to the general audience.
thanks
-akhilesh
Posting Rules
Members
Search
Help
Register
Login
Get a T-Shirt!
