Home » Audio » General » Critical Listening
Re: Critical Listening [message #2531 is a reply to message #2524] |
Mon, 19 December 2005 08:33 |
|
Wayne Parham
Messages: 18787 Registered: January 2001
|
Illuminati (33rd Degree) |
|
|
When I'm evaluating a new piece of equipment, I'm clearly listening to the machine. When I build a loudspeaker from a new design, I always listen for things like bass note progressions, expecting those recorded at the same amplitude to be heard at the same amplitude, not one note exaggerated above the others. I listen to voices, to hear if they are shrill or distorted. And I listen for overall balance and things like that. I'm sort of listening in a reductionist fashion, evaluating the sound based on each component part.After I am satisfied with a design, or if I'm using something that I've already found tried and true, I revert back to a more normal mode where I'm not listening to the machine anymore. I am just enjoying the music. It's a much more relaxed mode. That's the way I listen most of the time, listening to the performance rather than trying to find flaws. It's sort of like holistic listening.
|
|
|
|
|
Critical Listening
By: MWG on Sat, 17 December 2005 19:25
|
|
|
Re: Critical Listening
By: akhilesh on Sun, 18 December 2005 20:15
|
|
|
One of the reasons
By: MWG on Sun, 18 December 2005 22:36
|
|
|
B&W midrange
By: Duke on Mon, 19 December 2005 00:25
|
|
|
Re: B&W midrange
|
|
|
long division in your head during sex
|
|
|
For me it would have to be short division :) (NT)
By: MWG on Mon, 19 December 2005 20:31
|
|
|
Re: One of the reasons
|
|
|
Re: Critical Listening
|
|
|
Re: Critical Listening
|
|
|
Re: Critical Listening
|
|
|
Re: Critical Listening
By: MWG on Tue, 20 December 2005 07:44
|
|
|
Re: Critical Listening
|
|
|
For the record :)
By: MWG on Wed, 21 December 2005 19:30
|
|
|
Re: For the record :)
|
|
|
Re: For the record :)
By: MWG on Wed, 21 December 2005 20:41
|
|
|
Re: For the record :)
|
|
|
Re: For the record :)
|
|
|
Re: For the record :)
|
|
|
Re: For the record :)
|
|
|
Re: For the record :)
|
|
|
Re: For the record :)
|
|
|
Re: For the record :)
|
|
|
Re: For the record :)
|
|
|
Chet was the second coming nt
|
|
|
If you like Chet
By: MWG on Wed, 21 December 2005 07:57
|
|
|
Re: If you like Chet
|
|
|
Re: If you like Chet
By: MWG on Wed, 21 December 2005 19:28
|
|
|
Re: If you like Chet
|
|
|
Re: If you like Chet
By: MWG on Wed, 21 December 2005 20:35
|
|
|
Re: If you like Chet
By: steve f on Fri, 23 December 2005 13:19
|
|
|
Re: If you like Chet
|
|
|
Re: If you like Chet
By: steve f on Fri, 23 December 2005 18:16
|
|
|
Re: Critical Listening
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Tue Nov 26 00:46:18 CST 2024
|