AudioRoundTable.com: General » How would consumers re-difine audio re-production?

Home » Audio » General » How would consumers re-difine audio re-production?

Show: Today's Messages :: Navigator :: Polls
E-mail to friend

Re: Not when good enough is good enough [message #2433 is a reply to message #2430]

Mon, 14 November 2005 14:41

akhilesh
Messages: 1275
Registered: May 2009

Illuminati (3rd Degree)

Good analogy, Gman.
For years, I was happy with my cambridge soundworks audio system, though I didn;t listen to it a whole lot. Suddenly, one day, I got into this tube amp mania, and wanted to learn how to get good sound from little money.
But You are right: the majority of public wants SATISFICING rather than optimizing.
-akhilesh

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		How would consumers re-difine audio re-production? By: Manualblock on Sat, 12 November 2005 19:07
		Not when good enough is good enough By: GarMan on Mon, 14 November 2005 08:47
		Re: Not when good enough is good enough By: akhilesh on Mon, 14 November 2005 14:41
		Re: Not when good enough is good enough By: Manualblock on Mon, 14 November 2005 21:03
		Re: Not when good enough is good enough By: MWG on Mon, 14 November 2005 21:27
		Re: Not when good enough is good enough By: Manualblock on Tue, 15 November 2005 06:47
		What changed? By: GarMan on Tue, 15 November 2005 07:33
		Re: What changed? By: Manualblock on Tue, 15 November 2005 11:41
		Re: What changed? By: Wayne Parham on Tue, 15 November 2005 12:23
		Re: What changed? By: Manualblock on Tue, 15 November 2005 15:33
		Re: What changed? By: Wayne Parham on Wed, 16 November 2005 08:13
		Re: What changed? By: Manualblock on Wed, 16 November 2005 08:24

Previous Topic:	We should call "Craftsman" the "Maytag Forum"
Next Topic:	Hat's off to Steve Brown for a great day!

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Wed Jul 17 12:07:14 CDT 2024