If you reread my post you will see that I did not say that transmission line speakers suck. I did said that reflex boxes suck. I own a pair of transmission line speakers. They are the premier speakers made by Irving "Bud" Fried. They were originally sold with the name of C3Ls and then when he upgraded the speaker drivers and crossovers, he renamed the satelites as C5s (as part of his Vahalla system which sold for $10,000 in the 80s). I upgraded to the C5s. They are very excellent speakers. It is just that the Hedlund Horns are better, as they start with better quality drivers. Bud did say that the woofers in those speakers are higher Q drivers.

I am sure that the Lowther DX4s are excellent in transmission lines. I bet that you could duct tape a pair to the wall and if coupled with a suitable crossover, they would have respectable sound in that application too. But the point being made by this string of posts is that back horns are the best way to get the most efficiency and dynamics from full range speakers. My experience has confirmed this with Lowther DX4s and particularly so since they have such a low Q.

Transmission line speakers probably have a higher WAF then back horns, and you could sell them on that basis, but I doubt that transmission lines will have the dynamics and efficiency of back horns. They may not be different by a lot, but side by side, they would be a notch lower. My question to you is when you put a pair of Lowther DX4s into transmission lines, do you need to pad down the upper frequencies, or is the frequency response relatively flat (I doubt that Lowthers are "flat" in backhorns, but they are so when averaging over the frequency response and they sure sound great without crossover components in the signal path)?

Retsel