Home » Audio » Speaker » Updated the crossovers on my K-orns to spec
Re: Thought experiment & why sonic indistinguishability is not a bad thing [message #18399 is a reply to message #18397] |
Thu, 12 January 2006 08:35 |
hurdy_gurdyman
Messages: 416 Registered: May 2009
|
Illuminati (1st Degree) |
|
|
It seems like the history of most modern musical instruments has been to make them louder. I have examples of different historical instruments (origional and/or replicas) of the instruments I play, including fiddle (violin to you educated folks), banjo, mandolin, guitar and bagpipes. Over the last couple of centuries they have all gotten louder. Each new innovation has been to make the instrument louder so it can be heard better in an orchestra (even a four piece one). Unfortunately, all the other instruments are doing the same evolution. The drawback (sacrifice?) of all this is that the instruments get brighter and harsher sounding. An example would be the banjo (all banjo jokes aside). It started out with a gourd for a body and a fretless neck. This gave a nice mellow and thumpy sound. After a while someone replaced the gourd with a round wooden cheese box because it was sturdier and would take a beating better. It was noticed it became louder as well. Within a 100 year period all kinds of metal stuff was added, as well as harder wood, because each innovation made the instrument louder. It also made the instrument brighter and more metalic sounding. Frets were added, which added more brightness. Listen to a 1920's Gibson Mastertone like most Bluegrass banjos are patterned after, then listen to a 1850's minstrel banjo, then listen to an origional type gourd banjo (banjar). They don't even sound like the same class of instument. The modern one is almost unpleasant to listen to intimately. This seems to be similar to the evolution of the other instruments I'm very familiar with. I prefer the old styles for shear listening pleasure, just like I still enjoy tube amps and speakers that don't burn my ears off with etched detail. Sorry about the rant, but it's one of my pet peeves with music today and this seemed like a good place to vent. Dave
|
|
|
|
|
Updated the crossovers on my K-orns to spec
By: akhilesh on Sun, 01 January 2006 22:37
|
|
|
Re: Updated the crossovers on my K-orns to spec
|
|
|
Re: Updated the crossovers on my K-orns to spec
By: akhilesh on Mon, 02 January 2006 11:09
|
|
|
Re: Updated the crossovers on my K-orns to spec
|
|
|
Re: Updated the crossovers on my K-orns to spec
By: akhilesh on Fri, 06 January 2006 11:06
|
|
|
Re: Updated the crossovers on my K-orns to spec
|
|
|
Re: Updated the crossovers on my K-orns to spec
|
|
|
Tube amps versus SOLID state
By: akhilesh on Sat, 07 January 2006 10:55
|
|
|
Re: Tube amps versus SOLID state
|
|
|
Re: Tube amps versus SOLID state
By: akhilesh on Mon, 09 January 2006 10:37
|
|
|
Re: Tube amps versus SOLID state
|
|
|
Re: Tube amps versus SOLID state
By: akhilesh on Mon, 09 January 2006 14:44
|
|
|
Re: Tube amps versus SOLID state
By: GarMan on Mon, 09 January 2006 14:51
|
|
|
Re: Tube amps versus SOLID state
|
|
|
Thought experiment & why sonic indistinguishability is not a bad thing
By: akhilesh on Tue, 10 January 2006 11:05
|
|
|
Re: Thought experiment & why sonic indistinguishability is not a bad thing
|
|
|
Re: Thought experiment & why sonic indistinguishability is not a bad thing
By: akhilesh on Wed, 11 January 2006 11:07
|
|
|
Re: Thought experiment & why sonic indistinguishability is not a bad thing
|
|
|
Re: Thought experiment & why sonic indistinguishability is not a bad thing
By: akhilesh on Wed, 11 January 2006 15:35
|
|
|
Re: Thought experiment & why sonic indistinguishability is not a bad thing
|
|
|
Re: Thought experiment & why sonic indistinguishability is not a bad thing
|
|
|
Re: Thought experiment & why sonic indistinguishability is not a bad thing
|
|
|
Re: Thought experiment & why sonic indistinguishability is not a bad thing
|
|
|
Re: Thought experiment & why sonic indistinguishability is not a bad thing
|
|
|
Re: Thought experiment & why sonic indistinguishability is not a bad thing
|
|
|
More on old instruments
|
|
|
Re: More on old instruments
|
|
|
Re: More on old instruments
|
|
|
Re: More on old instruments
|
|
|
History of musical scales
|
|
|
Re: More on old instruments
|
|
|
"Something like plywood cabinets"
|
|
|
Re: Thought experiment & why sonic indistinguishability is not a bad thing
|
|
|
Re: Thought experiment & why sonic indistinguishability is not a bad thing
|
|
|
Cool link Wayne, and esp one para
By: akhilesh on Thu, 12 January 2006 10:37
|
|
|
Re: Cool link Wayne, and esp one para
|
|
|
Parameter shifts
|
|
|
I agree
By: akhilesh on Thu, 12 January 2006 14:48
|
|
|
Re: I agree
|
|
|
Re: Thought experiment & why sonic indistinguishability is not a bad thing
By: akhilesh on Thu, 12 January 2006 10:40
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Fri Nov 29 21:39:32 CST 2024
|