Home » Audio » Speaker » horn surfaces
Re: horn surfaces [message #17319 is a reply to message #17311] Sun, 09 January 2005 03:31 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Wayne Parham is currently offline  Wayne Parham
Messages: 18787
Registered: January 2001
Illuminati (33rd Degree)
You know Earl, you may be right about the absense of data to support a claim that a rough-walled horn is equal in performance to a smooth-walled horn used at low frequency.

But it does stand to reason.

I think though, that there is some indirect evidence of this fact. Folded horns use straight sections, each one expanding a little more than the one preceding it. This only approximates an exponential flare, yet the performance is similar to what is expected from a purely exponential flare.

The conclusion is easy to draw that the coarseness of the curve has little effect because it is small in relation to wavelength.

Wavelenghth can be scaled down to treble frequencies and horn flares with rough sand-grain texture become similar irregularities. Wavelengths are large compared to the grain of the horn surface, so my assumption is that it doesn't matter in the passband. But I guess a real test might be worth doing, to sand one smooth and compare the difference.

 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Poating Rules Re: Items for sale & Auctions
Next Topic: CORAL Flat 8A drivers on open baffles
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sat Nov 23 01:33:40 CST 2024

Sponsoring Organizations

DIY Audio Projects
DIY Audio Projects
OddWatt Audio
OddWatt Audio
Pi Speakers
Pi Speakers
Prosound Shootout
Prosound Shootout
Miller Audio
Miller Audio
Tubes For Amps
TubesForAmps.com

Lone Star Audiofest