AudioRoundTable.com: Source » Non-oversampled v. Oversampled

Home » Audio » Source » Non-oversampled v. Oversampled

Show: Today's Messages :: Navigator :: Polls
E-mail to friend

Re: Non-oversampled v. Oversampled [message #14067 is a reply to message #14066]

Thu, 15 January 2004 14:47

Wayne Parham
Messages: 18786
Registered: January 2001

Illuminati (33rd Degree)

Personally, I can see the merit in oversampling. Naturally, I'd rather have the recording made with high resolution samples done at a high rate. But since the recording is already made, another good option is to oversample and interpolate in hi-res. I can see the merit in this approach.

But for the tube guys, I can also see the attraction of a simple DAC that just spits out exactly what it gets. They roll of the top end with a simple filter function and let it fly. You're right that Audio Note makes some products like this. Maybe David Cope or Peter Qvortrup will comment at some point.

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Non-oversampled v. Oversampled By: Wayne Parham on Sun, 11 January 2004 10:31
		PAM implementations... By: Magnus on Wed, 14 January 2004 15:15
		Re: Non-oversampled v. Oversampled By: akhilesh on Thu, 15 January 2004 12:40
		Re: Non-oversampled v. Oversampled By: Wayne Parham on Thu, 15 January 2004 14:47
		Re: Non-oversampled v. Oversampled By: DRC on Tue, 20 January 2004 08:24
		Re: Non-oversampled v. Oversampled By: Wayne Parham on Wed, 17 March 2010 15:38
		Re: Non-oversampled v. Oversampled By: DRC on Fri, 16 January 2004 13:27
		Re: Non-oversampled v. Oversampled By: Wayne Parham on Fri, 16 January 2004 14:21

Previous Topic:	Hello noob here with an wounded Denon
Next Topic:	What are these controls? (Quanta 450sx)

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Wed Nov 27 03:38:43 CST 2024