| Popular myths about tube amps [message #99166] |
Sun, 11 January 2026 03:03  |
Kurt
Messages: 15 Registered: December 2025
|
Chancellor |
|
|
I am someone who's invested a lot in keeping tube amps alive and it saddens me when I see some myths about thermionic emission around some communities.
Which ones have you seen recently?
Personally, I have one that I've seen and I would like to clear the air about them.
I've seen this myth that tube amps are inferior to solid-state. I believe this is absolute nonsense. I mean we've got recent tubes from brands such as Tung-Sol performing absolutely better than vintage Nos, for example. I've got the boutique 50W head doing well since 2019 when I got it. I've only done some routine bias checks and occasional tube replacement. I believe that reliability comes from great power supply design and not basically from pushing tubes beyond specs.
Which other ones do you have in mind that you think are wrong?
|
|
|
|
| Re: Popular myths about tube amps [message #99169 is a reply to message #99166] |
Thu, 15 January 2026 08:28   |
positron
Messages: 163 Registered: May 2020
|
Master |
|
|
Kurt wrote on Sun, 11 January 2026 03:03I am someone who's invested a lot in keeping tube amps alive and it saddens me when I see some myths about thermionic emission around some communities.
Which ones have you seen recently?
Personally, I have one that I've seen and I would like to clear the air about them.
I've seen this myth that tube amps are inferior to solid-state. I believe this is absolute nonsense. I mean we've got recent tubes from brands such as Tung-Sol performing absolutely better than vintage Nos, for example. I've got the boutique 50W head doing well since 2019 when I got it. I've only done some routine bias checks and occasional tube replacement. I believe that reliability comes from great power supply design and not basically from pushing tubes beyond specs.
Which other ones do you have in mind that you think are wrong?
Hi Kurt,
I have also heard that myth about SS being better. Nothing could be further
from the truth. I have a couple of posts in this string, below, mentioning
just a few differences, and why SS will never be perfect to the source but
Tube amplifier can be extremely close.
One caveat to mention is that as one gets closer to perfect accuracy to the
source, one must be more careful to the "little" things.
As one example, I have been R&D analog since 1980, delving into audio
perception and component design, and use multiple 6N pure copper speaker wires
in parallel, for both minimal inductance at high frequencies, and total gauge
for optimal woofer damping (at least the best one can obtain).
Besides those two, one must consider a flat response over the entire audio
band since the speaker impedance changes (usually cone types) from minimal
to maximum. I have found that there is an optimal total gauge that will give
flattest frequency response, and most natural sound.
https://audioroundtable.com/forum/index.php?t=msg&th=21561&start=0&
Thanks for starting this string Kurt.
Cheers
pos
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Popular myths about tube amps [message #99403 is a reply to message #99398] |
Sun, 10 May 2026 23:44  |
positron
Messages: 163 Registered: May 2020
|
Master |
|
|
I for one will never use a SS amplifier (or preamplifier). It is all
tube for me except for the dac. There are just inherent problems with
SS that cannot be solved.
Tubes designs are a completely different story. I have described some of
the inherent problems with SS in another string called "Solid State vs
Vacuum Amps", in this Tube subforum.
I finished up my phono stage (except somewhat haywire look) and I do find
some LPs superior but costly, to high rez ss dacs).
Cheers
steve
|
|
|
|