Home » Audio » Thermionic Emissions » Popular myths about tube amps (Which One surprises you the most?)
Popular myths about tube amps [message #99166] Sun, 11 January 2026 03:03 Go to next message
Kurt is currently offline  Kurt
Messages: 3
Registered: December 2025
Esquire
I am someone who's invested a lot in keeping tube amps alive and it saddens me when I see some myths about thermionic emission around some communities.

Which ones have you seen recently?

Personally, I have one that I've seen and I would like to clear the air about them.

I've seen this myth that tube amps are inferior to solid-state. I believe this is absolute nonsense. I mean we've got recent tubes from brands such as Tung-Sol performing absolutely better than vintage Nos, for example. I've got the boutique 50W head doing well since 2019 when I got it. I've only done some routine bias checks and occasional tube replacement. I believe that reliability comes from great power supply design and not basically from pushing tubes beyond specs.

Which other ones do you have in mind that you think are wrong?
Re: Popular myths about tube amps [message #99169 is a reply to message #99166] Thu, 15 January 2026 08:28 Go to previous message
positron is currently offline  positron
Messages: 154
Registered: May 2020
Master
Kurt wrote on Sun, 11 January 2026 03:03
I am someone who's invested a lot in keeping tube amps alive and it saddens me when I see some myths about thermionic emission around some communities.

Which ones have you seen recently?

Personally, I have one that I've seen and I would like to clear the air about them.

I've seen this myth that tube amps are inferior to solid-state. I believe this is absolute nonsense. I mean we've got recent tubes from brands such as Tung-Sol performing absolutely better than vintage Nos, for example. I've got the boutique 50W head doing well since 2019 when I got it. I've only done some routine bias checks and occasional tube replacement. I believe that reliability comes from great power supply design and not basically from pushing tubes beyond specs.

Which other ones do you have in mind that you think are wrong?

Hi Kurt,

I have also heard that myth about SS being better. Nothing could be further
from the truth. I have a couple of posts in this string, below, mentioning
just a few differences, and why SS will never be perfect to the source but
Tube amplifier can be extremely close.

One caveat to mention is that as one gets closer to perfect accuracy to the
source, one must be more careful to the "little" things.

As one example, I have been R&D analog since 1980, delving into audio
perception and component design, and use multiple 6N pure copper speaker wires
in parallel, for both minimal inductance at high frequencies, and total gauge
for optimal woofer damping (at least the best one can obtain).

Besides those two, one must consider a flat response over the entire audio
band since the speaker impedance changes (usually cone types) from minimal
to maximum. I have found that there is an optimal total gauge that will give
flattest frequency response, and most natural sound.


https://audioroundtable.com/forum/index.php?t=msg&th=21561&start=0&

Thanks for starting this string Kurt.

Cheers

pos
Previous Topic: Tung-Sol 7581A vs Tung-Sol 6L6G Big Bottle
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sat Jan 24 13:17:09 CST 2026

Sponsoring Organizations

DIY Audio Projects
DIY Audio Projects
OddWatt Audio
OddWatt Audio
Pi Speakers
Pi Speakers
Prosound Shootout
Prosound Shootout
Miller Audio
Miller Audio
Tubes For Amps
TubesForAmps.com

Lone Star Audiofest