| 
		
 | 
	| 
		
 | 
	
		
		
			| Re: Mullard KT88 [message #98826 is a reply to message #98812] | 
			Mon, 08 September 2025 12:15    | 
		 
		
			
				
				
				  | 
					
						  
						Wayne Parham
						 Messages: 18979 Registered: January 2001 
						
					 | 
					Illuminati  (33rd Degree)  | 
					 | 
		 
		 
	 | 
 
	
		 
OK, so I've had my new Mullard KT88 tubes in my amplifier for a little less than a month now and have listened for probably a couple dozen hours or so, mostly in two hours stretches or thereabouts.  So it's time to report back. 
 
This is just a listening evaluation without measurements, and that's something I normally don't do.  That said, take this post for what it is.  Total seat of the pants observation. 
 
So far, I think I like these tubes.  They are somewhere between the Tung-Sol 6550 and the Electro-Harmonix 6550 in the range of smoothness.  Neither of those tubes lack smoothness, but the EH sounds a little more detailed and the TS sounds a little more laid-back.  The Mullard KT88 is sort of in-between. 
 
To be honest, I am interested also in the longevity of these Mullards in my Audio Note Kit 2.  I think I may have mentioned this here or in another thread, but just in case I hadn't, I find that KT88 tubes don't last as long as 6550 tubes.  They don't fail right out of the box, but they do seem to have a shorter lifespan.  We'll see on these. 
 
They do sound nice though.  Time will tell if they get to be "regular stock" tubes for me like the Tung-Sols and the Electro-Harmonix. 
		
		
		
 |  
	| 
		
	 | 
 
 
 | 
	
		
		
			| Re: Mullard KT88 [message #98829 is a reply to message #98826] | 
			Thu, 11 September 2025 23:02    | 
		 
		
			
				
				
				
					
						  
						positron
						 Messages: 145 Registered: May 2020 
						
					 | 
					Master  | 
					 | 
		 
		 
	 | 
 
	
		Wayne Parham wrote on Mon, 08 September 2025 12:15 
OK, so I've had my new Mullard KT88 tubes in my amplifier for a little less than a month now and have listened for probably a couple dozen hours or so, mostly in two hours stretches or thereabouts.  So it's time to report back. 
 
This is just a listening evaluation without measurements, and that's something I normally don't do.  That said, take this post for what it is.  Total seat of the pants observation. 
 
So far, I think I like these tubes.  They are somewhere between the Tung-Sol 6550 and the Electro-Harmonix 6550 in the range of smoothness.  Neither of those tubes lack smoothness, but the EH sounds a little more detailed and the TS sounds a little more laid-back.  The Mullard KT88 is sort of in-between. 
 
To be honest, I am interested also in the longevity of these Mullards in my Audio Note Kit 2.  I think I may have mentioned this here or in another thread, but just in case I hadn't, I find that KT88 tubes don't last as long as 6550 tubes.  They don't fail right out of the box, but they do seem to have a shorter lifespan.  We'll see on these. 
 
They do sound nice though.  Time will tell if they get to be "regular stock" tubes for me like the Tung-Sols and the Electro-Harmonix. 
 
Thanks for your report Wayne. I think we both agree on the sound vs the  
TS 6550. As mentioned previously, I am running the tubes idle at  
~440 P-K volts with cathode bias. 
 
As mentioned in another post somewhere, I had a TS short with less than a 
thousand hours, and side getters quite used on all 4 of the tubes.  
 
I have not tried with higher P-K voltage and/or with fixed bias with the M 
tubes.  
 
So far, I am very pleased with the new Mullard KT88s. Will keep in touch  
if any problems.  
 
Cheers 
 
pos 
		
		
		
 |  
	| 
		
	 | 
 
 
 | 
	| 
		
 |