Home » xyzzy » Dungeon » Empire
Re: Empire [message #98637 is a reply to message #98636] Wed, 28 May 2025 15:30 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Wayne Parham is currently offline  Wayne Parham
Messages: 18927
Registered: January 2001
Illuminati (33rd Degree)

Rusty, my friend, you wrote:

Rusty wrote on Wed, 28 May 2025 15:09
I don't expect to change your beliefs and I'm not trying to. I'm just writing about what I am learning as I go along.

But you're not learning.  You have taken a side and are reinforcing it with the same old bloggers.

There was a time when I thought as you do now, that Putin was a good leader for Russia.  I have learned since then that I was wrong.

The Google search link I provided is a generic search.  Some of the articles returned by the search are from western sources, but some come from the east, some even from Russians.

When Putin was first made president, I thought he might be good for Russia.  But the Russians I knew - way back then - set me straight.  The first time I heard reasons to be leery about Putin was in 2000, when a Russian immigrant told me what Putin was like in East Germany and St. Petersburg.  He and others were very concerned that Putin would make Russia an evil empire.

Their opinions have been proven to be correct.  Putin has made Russia a terrorist state.
Re: Empire [message #98638 is a reply to message #98637] Wed, 28 May 2025 21:19 Go to previous messageGo to next message
gofar99 is currently offline  gofar99
Messages: 1998
Registered: May 2010
Location: Southern Arizona
Illuminati (5th Degree)
Hi All,  I have been following this for a while but resisted commenting.  Some things seem really clear to me (not in any particular order). Ukraine didn't start the present conflict,  Putin did.  China is empire building.  Just today they started to improve an island about 400 miles south of Guam. They aren't doing that to improve their trading needs.   They have their tentacles in Panama.  They don't want Australia to meddle with them on Australian turf.  They have navy assets there now.  They want Taiwan.  There are more such instances.  If it isn't empire building I don't know what it should be called. The one thing in their favor (if you can call it that) is that they have already figured out it is more to their benefit to trade with us particularly when it favors them than to get into a global conflict in which neither of us will do well. *  At one time the US did engage in empire building.  The current President would like to do that but the places he indicates are not for the taking in any peaceful manner.  He can buy golf courses and hotels, but Greenland isn't for sale.  The EU doesn't want Russian territory and would be glad to have Russia as a respectful trading partner.  The opposite certainly doesn't seem true.  In all this mess it seems as if our President is screwing up relations with folks he should be cultivating for mutual benefit.  There is a lot more, but I'll save that for another time.  

* A side issue...trying to get manufacturing back to the US is a good thought.  Trying to do so quickly is naive. It will be a really long endeavor. Tariffs will not make that happen sooner.  


Good Listening
Bruce
Re: Empire [message #98639 is a reply to message #98638] Thu, 29 May 2025 09:48 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Wayne Parham is currently offline  Wayne Parham
Messages: 18927
Registered: January 2001
Illuminati (33rd Degree)

I totally agree with you, Bruce.

And an extra mention on the tariff stuff.  It's tricky but, in my opinion, we probably have needed to do something about the trade imbalances for decades.

Fair trade is a good thing.  But lopsided trade is just stupid for us to have allowed.  Not sure why we allowed it for so long.  Now it feels very difficult to "dial it back."  It's looks pretty tricky.

And another adjacent matter - protectionism.  I used to have a laissez-faire attitude towards that.  I thought there was no need to protect an American industry.  When we make the best stuff at the best price, no problem.

Even when the Japanese started beating us with better cars in the late 1970s, I thought that was our own fault.  We were making junk and their cars were better.  German cars were better too.  My opinion back then was that we needed to get off our butts and design and build better cars.  I thought we made better cars for decades, especially in the 1960s.  My opinion was that we just needed to rise to the challenge of the 1970s and 1980s.

Eventually we self-corrected.  Our car manufacturers did begin making better cars and by the 1990s, we were competitive again.  So the beating we took in the 1980s was really a self-inflicted wound.  Too much government pressure to shift design goals in the 1970s, and too slow to respond by the car manufacturers.

At least that's how I saw it.

But I see something else now.  The Chinese government subsidizes a market, taking a loss in that market for a lengthy period of time.  Essentially, the American companies producing products in the market China wants to control are under economic attack.  It is economic siege warfare.

In the beginning of the siege period, Americans (and people in other countries, for that matter) - both individuals and companies needing supplies - shift from buying American products under siege and instead purchase the low-cost Chinese products.  Often times, the Chinese products are of poor quality because the Chinese have little experience at first.  But the cost is so low, American companies buying the inferior import products will make do with it.  In many cases, it is repaired, retooled or otherwise made serviceable after import.  The cost is so low, it is still economically viable.

After a while, the American companies making products in the market under attack slow production or cease entirely.  We have lost a lot of industries that way in the last few decades.  China has successfully monopolized several markets using that strategy.

And now that I look back, I realize the situation in Japan was somewhat similar in the 1960s and 1970s.  It wasn't done exactly the same way - Japan wasn't subsidizing their industries - America did it as economic assistance.  We were still helping Japan get on its feet after WWII.

I'm not sure I feel the same way about that as I do about the invasive market take-overs that China has done.  But the results to the American economy were probably the same.  American car companies eventually came back after a pretty bad beating, but the American consumer electronics market really never recovered.

So I think we must be much more careful in the matters of trade going forward.  I like it when we can be helpful, as I think was initially the case in Japan.  But I also think we have to protect our own interests.  Otherwise, we'll find ourselves being unable to do things we once were great at.  We'll be "out of shape."
Re: Empire [message #98640 is a reply to message #98639] Thu, 29 May 2025 12:09 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Rusty is currently offline  Rusty
Messages: 1368
Registered: May 2018
Location: Kansas City Missouri
Illuminati (3rd Degree)
Your both are so wrong on so many fronts its hard to accommodate an answer to. Economically, geopolitically and what an empire, (as in economic power) is all about.

I don't feel Wayne its of any use to play ping pong with you as we have about the notion of evil Putin and his government and what the Ukrainian conflict is all about that is the real geopolitical truth. I've given more than enough factual account for what that is, with the help of those sources I use. That you can dismiss it with just personal experiences and relationships and articles written that reflect the manipulations of government to sway public opinion. It's about what is to be expected from anyone that with such a narrow framework of subjective feelings and our commercial journalism which does not do justice to their ethical standards.

China Bruce is an example of empire that has no ambitions of being a sole hegemonic sovereign state that our country has done. That they have literally pulled themselves out of abject poverty to the level they've attained just in our lifetimes is an accomplishment never realized before in human history. They interact with nations on a win win relationship. They do not bully, provoke or sanction or war monger as our country does historically and to this day. Taiwan to them is part of their territory just as Puerto Rico is to us. Maybe they should start arming that island and put their troops there. Or Cuba! Maybe they should start sending warships into the Gulf of (MEXICO) to antagonize our government. They had purchased the ports in Panama fair and square and had updated them. Why can't other nations branch out into the world as the United States has done with impunity?

The fact is you two is that this country of ours is a basket case of its own doing. Its our economic system that has financialized to the point that it is eating away at itself like a parasite. And we can't keep up in the world to the nations that we had tried to use their cheap labor to further enable our financial free lunch with our monopoly with the dollar that we use to punish with.

But we still have this Pollyanna notion we're the sole arbiter of freedom and democracy. We aren't! Either one. We are a war mongering, selfish and arrogant nation of wealthy elites that call the shots. We the people have no influence what-so-ever.



Re: Empire [message #98641 is a reply to message #98640] Thu, 29 May 2025 13:40 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Rusty is currently offline  Rusty
Messages: 1368
Registered: May 2018
Location: Kansas City Missouri
Illuminati (3rd Degree)
Using bloggers, economists, political scientists, military veterans with world geopolitical experience and people with national security experience gathering information is useful to supplement your personal educational views. I don't think just reading headlines or viewing corporate news is nearly enough to give an understanding of how the world operates economically and politically. Both being bedfellows.

This fellow is a journalist that takes the time to read policy papers that our network of deep state corporate think tank organizations have funded to churn out the methodology that the legislative and executive branches adopt along with their respective political committees use as their political platforms.

Brian Berletic here goes over an article in the NY Times that "suggests" that the Trump administration has deviated from established policy reflected in think tank papers that the administration has culled from almost word for word in speeches recently. What Mr. Berletic is laying out here is that the political end of the deep state is more of the sales branch of policy that the corporate think tanks and lobbyists bring to them to "sell" to the public. Such as Project 2025.

Berletic though says there are no policy papers to substantiate the article being written in the NYT's. Thus what commander and chief Trump states in the article is a ruse he uses common to his style of innuendo to stretching the truth. Saying that the world can accommodate multiple hegemonic empires. Implying the US, China and Russia. When the truth is as laid out in the policy paper is that the administration truly is following what the United States has been following as the hegemonic sole dominant world empire player its followed since post WWII.

Our press and media never try and tease out such detailed analysis of what the truth is that our government is really up to. And the public is not informed enough to judge whether or not our government is working for the true interests of ordinary people. But its a sure bet that the interests of our wealthy elite are the true recipients of the advantage that our government is playing cat and mouse in world geopolitics. After all, their the ones that write the play book for the politicians to play the game by.

I suspect YMMV though for any eyeballs attached here.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xCYwDtaRu6E
Re: Empire [message #98642 is a reply to message #98641] Thu, 29 May 2025 15:07 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Wayne Parham is currently offline  Wayne Parham
Messages: 18927
Registered: January 2001
Illuminati (33rd Degree)

https://audioroundtable.com/images/Putin_Huilo.jpg
Re: Empire [message #98643 is a reply to message #98642] Thu, 29 May 2025 22:04 Go to previous messageGo to next message
gofar99 is currently offline  gofar99
Messages: 1998
Registered: May 2010
Location: Southern Arizona
Illuminati (5th Degree)
Hi All, A good discussion that covers the subject from different viewpoints.  With that siad I take my leave...

Good Listening
Bruce
Re: Empire [message #98646 is a reply to message #98643] Fri, 30 May 2025 10:55 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Rusty is currently offline  Rusty
Messages: 1368
Registered: May 2018
Location: Kansas City Missouri
Illuminati (3rd Degree)
To anyone interested, it might be useful for your edification to listen to these two senior economists that I admittedly reference often. Because they are two of our greatest living national treasures we have whom the general public has no knowledge of. Unfortunately.

Hudson & Wolff. Here they go over the core of capitalism. Its origins, promises, successes and limitations and hopefully its demise, (particularly in the form its in currently). They describe how classical economics and its explanation of value theory has been manipulated into the opposite of what the classical economists Adam Smith and David Ricardo described the free market being. Free from economic rent! Free from the then parasitic renters class making money in their sleep and siphoning capital away from useful benefit to their own conspicuous consumption. Today the equivalent are the banking financier's and Wall Street.

They explain how Karl Marx and his remarkable volumes of capitalism took value theory from Smith & Ricardo and explained further the worker relationship with the capitalist and their surplus exchange, trade consolidation, monopolization and how industrial capitalism could become socialism in its final development. Never to be realized of course.

Listening to these two gives a foundation to understand where our country and the other capitalist countries following current neoliberal financial capitalism are experiencing the trials and tribulations that are degrading our way of life. Taking particular note in China's successful development is that their financial structure keeps banking as a public-state owned entity. Eliminating the capitalist monopoly on finance opens up the means to preventing the free lunch, money in their sleep financial class from hijacking the economy as ours has been made.

Economics and geopolitics mimic one another. So its little wonder from our finance capitalist economics how our country has in its dominant world character come to monopolize its influence through colonization, militarism, Imperialism etc. to maintain that dominance over the years.

It has become a burden to the world. Which countries now once part of the 3rd world are strategically aligning to counter our dominance.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=loxwfNQw17o


Re: Empire [message #98649 is a reply to message #98646] Sat, 31 May 2025 08:16 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Rusty is currently offline  Rusty
Messages: 1368
Registered: May 2018
Location: Kansas City Missouri
Illuminati (3rd Degree)
Watching this video this morning gives clarity to the abject absurdity that our government is going about now with whatever it is that diplomacy is supposed to be. Its a complete farse! Its a carnival ride of deception and collusion towards subordination of countries to literally kiss our ass! The Trump administration sows nothing but chaos. Irrelevant contradictory gobbledygook.

Panel discussion with former Ambassador Charles Freeman and Colonel Lawrence Wilkerson. Very informative yet exasperating illumination of our worse than ever diplomacy and state craft.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1rsuGiI1_Ms&list=PLzImU_KHY9-JjAIg0AZXxHaMhJD6UXfNj&index=1
Re: Empire [message #98664 is a reply to message #98649] Mon, 02 June 2025 14:05 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Rusty is currently offline  Rusty
Messages: 1368
Registered: May 2018
Location: Kansas City Missouri
Illuminati (3rd Degree)
Nice article from Alistair Crooke, former British diplomat about the American financial Monetary system losing ground to China. The real reason for the trade war. Alistair is a very classy and astute Brit. that has the experience of years of diplomacy work and the British national security organization MI5.

China's monetary system and state banking is overtaking the SWIFT trade clearing system that due to our sanctioning policy has, like computer chips and a host of other things caused the sanctioned-ee's to forge their own systems for trade clearing, computer chips and "things". They don't need or particularly want our bond dollars anymore. Our free lunch for our military complex. And China can do trade without us. They would like to but since we do nothing but antagonize. Why?

The United States monetary financial empire is sputtering due to its very own arrogant hegemony beliefs of dominance. Things can get tough for us little people. Our government doesn't plan things well other than trying to undermine other countries.

https://strategic-culture.su/news/2025/06/02/one-quiet-early-morning-in-beijing-the-dollars-crown-slipped/
I can't help but think of an old song by Bob Wills and his Texas Playboys to compare to our leadership's dilemma.

I Can't Go On This Way...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rheqGynrt0M
Previous Topic: Ukraine
Next Topic: Impeachment Drama
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sat Jun 14 23:51:14 CDT 2025

Sponsoring Organizations

DIY Audio Projects
DIY Audio Projects
OddWatt Audio
OddWatt Audio
Pi Speakers
Pi Speakers
Prosound Shootout
Prosound Shootout
Miller Audio
Miller Audio
Tubes For Amps
TubesForAmps.com

Lone Star Audiofest