Re: 6N11 vs 6922, E88CC, and 6DJ8 tubes [message #98305 is a reply to message #98302] |
Sat, 08 February 2025 10:05 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/413e0/413e00f5cba1f3b2b5107f9dcfe0ee2b05c7be55" alt="Go to previous message Go to previous message" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bd0ac/bd0ac06bc0716245c70e1d7ca4a193e4fbe25374" alt="Go to next message Go to previous message" |
kasperbergholt
Messages: 47 Registered: August 2021 Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
|
Baron |
|
|
gofar99 wrote on Tue, 04 February 2025 19:55Hi, I guess ..what is the question? I personally have better results in my circuits with ECC types unless there is a ruggedized version of it. The rugged / industrial one can be better. For example I use a lot of ECC803 types but in a few of the designs the 7025s are a bit quieter and more consistent. So from your choices I would likely use either the ECC88 or 6922.
What you didn't ask is if all the tubes from all manufacturers are equal. The short answer is they will work but not all are going to give you the same sonic performance. If you can find someone with the same unit it would worth asking what if anything they tried and what they liked (and why naturally).
Than you for the reply gofar99 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3fe30/3fe30d086fb8a005cac78aa72cd9a30aa4741d8f" alt="Smile"
I haven't used any equipment with Russian or Chinese input or rectifier tubes before, so the (most important question) is whether the Chinese 6N11 is 100% interchangable 6922, E88CC and 6DJ8 tubes.
But everything seems to point in that direction.
Some sources state that the Chinese 6Z4 rectifier tube used in the DAC can be swapped with 6X4, EZ90, 6CP5, others that both values and pin layouts are different.
|
|
|